Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. Seems like the topic is not notable under the Wikipedia definition of [[WP:N|notability]]. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 08:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
===[[Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty]]===
:{{la|Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 16#{{anchorencode:Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Subpopulation_Algorithm_based_on_Novelty Stats]</span>)
Line 8 ⟶ 15:
*'''Delete''', [[WP:TOOSOON]]. Based on a single recent publication that Google scholar lists as having only three citations; actually what it has is two self-citations and something that was published earlier and listed erroneously, so there are no independent references, even ones as minimal as a brief citation. Fails [[WP:NOR]], [[WP:GNG]], and probably [[WP:REFSPAM]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:'''
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 10:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --
*'''Delete''' per above. Lacks sufficient context and at least needs a parent topic article before we get this deep. If it turns out to be important, we can revive it later, but right now it's kind of [[WP:NOCONTEXT]] [[User:Jergling|Jergling]] ([[User talk:Jergling|talk]]) 16:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' As per definition, notability is something famous or important. It is a new paradigm created in 2015 by a small group of researches, so it does not match the famous portion of the definition. However, it was published by a high impact journal (3.6) and the results reported does surpass all algorithms currently known in one of the hardest benchmarks of multi-objective, specially when the problem gets harder. Moreover, the basic paradigm of the approach is simple although completely different from anything done before. Thus, it seems important. So I vote to keep. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/118.14.212.118|118.14.212.118]] ([[User talk:118.14.212.118#top|talk]]) 10:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><small>— [[Special:Contributions/118.14.212.118|118.14.212.118]] ([[User talk:118.14.212.118|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
::Hi 118.14.212.118 Wikipedia has its own [[WP:N|Notabality standard]] which is largely based on the depth of coverage in secondary sources, not by whether or not the original idea is sufficiently important, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 14:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' – Per nom. —[[User:MelbourneStar|<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b>]]<span style="color:#FF9F00;">☆</span>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup style="color:#407">'''''talk'''''</sup>]] 10:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||