Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-object programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:24, 12 February 2022

Latest revision as of 21:19, 23 April 2022

Line 8:

===[[Post-object programming]]===

I've searched references for the whole content of the article for too long, yet haven't been lucky. I've already asked for them in the talkl page again and again, with no answer. The original article had a whole section which was nonsense (see Talk page), so I believe the article's topic is completely made up, or maybe original research by some non-expert in the topic. In conclusion, the article is non-verifiable and (consequently) perhaps original research. [[User:Euyyn|euyyn]] 00:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

*If this were a notable programming method, one would expect a fair amount of google hits (since it is related to computers). But [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22post-object+programming%22&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official this isn't the case]. Thus, I must say, '''delete'''. -- [[User:Where|<b><font colorstyle="color:blue;">Where</font></b>]] 00:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

*'''Expand''' or '''delete'''. I think it might be a valid article except that no references have been given for the article. Unless sources can be given, '''delete'''. - [[User:DNewhall|DNewhall]] 01:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

*'''Comment''': I repeated my search for references (with google: [http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22post-object+programming%22+-%22is+a+new+generation%22+-%22aspect-oriented+programming%22&btnG=B%C3%BAsqueda&meta= "post-object programming" -"is a new generation" -"aspect-oriented programming"], trying to avoid WP mirrors and pages about AOP - which says it's a kind of Post-object P.) and among the 95 results found 2 (non-chinesse) pages about the topic: