Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nested Context Language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:14, 9 February 2022

Latest revision as of 02:05, 4 May 2022

Line 10:

:{{la|Nested Context Language}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nested Context Language|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 25#{{anchorencode:Nested Context Language}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nested_Context_Language Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources|Nested Context Language}})

Unreferenced; fails to meet notability as well as [[WP:V]] [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|_{'''<font colorstyle="green">Fortuna<font color=":green;"></font></font>'''Fortuna'''}]] ^{'''''[[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<fontsup colorstyle="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi</fontsup>]]'''''} 17:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

* '''Keep''' It is (and is already referenced as) an ITU standard. Is the nominator planning on taking ''every'' telecoms-related XML standard to AfD? Have they read the comments against such behaviour elsewhere, at recent AfDs and at the RFC/U about them? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 00:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)