Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/His excellency: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Panoptical (talk | contribs) closing case |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7:
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
===His excellency (6th)===
Line 108:
:Yup, that's him. Fire up the CheckUser. - [[User:Merzbow|Merzbow]] 08:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
:These appear to me as well to be the same user.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 08:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
:{{clerknote}} archived the previous case. -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]]
{{Inconclusive}}. Looks unrelated but editing patterns are still quite strong.'''[[User talk:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]''' 14:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Line 130:
:I agree; one of H.E.'s favorite haunts was the "Criticism of the critics" area of [[Criticism of Islam]], this sock seems to be an SPA focused exclusively on that area. The accusations of bigotry, etc. are all par for the course for our guy. - [[User:Merzbow|Merzbow]] 21:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Added {{user|Gridges}}; created just after I blocked {{user|Habibz}} for the sole reason of complaining about the block. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<
::Added {{user|Yorkuz}}; created in order to revert a couple of Habibz edits on [[Criticism of Islam]] and then blank large sections just because he was mad about getting blocked on his last couple of sockpuppets. I've been looking at the contribs of {{user|His excellency}} and it appears to present a long history of disruption, incivility and use of puppets(including anonymous-IP) to avoid the indefinite ban.
Line 148:
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
|