Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparse representation of a number: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
d
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 19:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
===[[Sparse representation of a number]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
 
 
:{{la|Sparse representation of a number}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparse representation of a number|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 831#{{anchorencode:Sparse representation of a number}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sparse_representation_of_a_number Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Sparse representation of a number}})
Original research. Largely unsourced and searching turns up nothing. The sources seem to be on another system, e.g. the one described at [[skew binary number system]], and are only associated with one section; the main body of the article is unsourced. See also the talk page for a discussion after it was Proded and de-Proded. <small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 18:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Line 10 ⟶ 17:
*'''Delete''' The first example given in the article is basically [[run length encoding]] for the digits of a binary number. RLE for binary strings is well known and has been used in some compression schemes. While figuring out arithmetic algorithms for the RLE representation is an interesting academic exercise, I was unable to find sources (other than the section of the paper discussed above) discussing this representation either as a sparse number or as a run length encoded number. It leads me to believe that the article, while well-intentioned, is [[WP:OR|original research]]. Without multiple in-depth reliable sources per [[WP:RS]], this topic fails notability thresholds as described in [[WP:GNG]]. Given the mention in the paper above, this could be selectively merged into [[Skew binary number system]], but just a single section of a single primary paper is a thin foundation for a merge. Deletion, until multiple sources become available that discuss this number system, may be the best course. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Sparse representations of bitvectors are definitely important, and there has even been some interesting research on algorithmic problems of arithmetic with sparse binary numbers (those with few 1's in their binary representation; see Plaisted, "New NP-hard and NP-complete polynomial and integer divisibility problems", FOCS 1977). That said, this article doesn't touch on any of that, its references are useless for establishing notability of this topic (they're on something peripheral to it), and to the extent that what it says is non-obvious it appears to be original research. So, per [[WP:TNT]], if this were to be turned into a usable article it would need to be completely rewritten, and there's no point in keeping the present version while we wait for that to happen. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
*:Indeed, since it is an unrelated subject. The only common things between both of those topics is that the adjective sparse appear in them and they are used for data structure [[User:Arthur MILCHIOR|Arthur MILCHIOR]] ([[User talk:Arthur MILCHIOR|talk]]) 06:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
*I'm not going to vote. I think I can find more sources, but not after the end of the summer holiday, when I'll be back in my university. Since it's going to take at least a month, and that I understand very-well that there is no easy way right now to assess notability, I understand that it will be deleted. But, no original research, even if I clearly see that there is no way to distinguish OR from non-OR without sources. Even if it is not merged to [[Skew binary number system]], if (when) this page is deleted, the Skew page will need to be edited in order to explain how sparseness can be used on numbers presetend in a Skew binary system. [[User:Arthur MILCHIOR|Arthur MILCHIOR]] ([[User talk:Arthur MILCHIOR|talk]]) 06:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —[[User:UY Scuti|<span style="color:CornflowerBlue; font-family:Times;">'''UY Scuti'''</span>]] [[User talk:UY Scuti|<sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk</sup>]] 19:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Final relist. Seeing as sources may be forthcoming in the future, might as well do this. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Well'''... there's two refs. The one I can read uses "Sparse representation" and describes it and its benefits (some). So it's not like the article creator just made this up. On the other hand, that's about all Google can find... JSTOR finds nothing... "Sparse representation" by itself mainly refers to other things, such as signal processing and stuff. As far as I can tell the authors of that one paper made up the term and its description. My ''guess'' is that they didn't, so '''keep''' the article is my gut feeling. Math is hard. I tagged it as being poorly referenced. [[User:Herostratus|Herostratus]] ([[User talk:Herostratus|talk]]) 18:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>