Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allvue Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Allvue Systems: Reply |
→Allvue Systems: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Allvue Systems]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. ♠[[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]]♠ [[User_talk:Premeditated Chaos|(talk)]] 10:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
▲===[[:Allvue Systems]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Allvue Systems}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allvue Systems|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 April 28#{{anchorencode:Allvue Systems}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1085095315/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 9 ⟶ 14:
*'''Delete''' I was in the middle of bringing this here, but {{u|Timtrent}} beat me to it! Pure ADMASQ, sources are just press release regurgitations and the like, and a search finds only more of the same. Fails [[WP:GNG]] / [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. --[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 11:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
*:@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] If only the editors involved in creating material like this listened during the AFC review process AfD would not be troubled so often with inappropriate unilateral moves. That one may do a thing does not mean one should. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 12:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
:Sorry, didn't realise the process is it's kept in drafts as edits are done, I've moved it back now, would you be able to link me to the page that explains how you get reviews done in the draftspace? [[User:Squaumau|Squaumau]] ([[User talk:Squaumau|talk]]) 14:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
::I believe we should interpret that as a request by {{U|Squaumau}} to '''Draftify''' the article.
::To further your knowledge, Squaumau, I suggest you go to [[WP:TEAHOUSE]], where you may ask all the questions you wish, or as an ''alternative'' to [[WP:AFCHD]]. Pick one or the other, but not both, please. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 22:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
:::Hi Timtrent, thanks for the links - I think I am requesting to draftify. I'll make sure do it the proper way going forward [[User:Squaumau|Squaumau]] ([[User talk:Squaumau|talk]]) 13:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
*'''Weak Delete''' pending a review of the sources (which I might or might not do). On its face, there are [[WP:N|notability]] and [[WP:TONE|tone]] concerns. The article is written from the corporation's viewpoint, and does not report on what third parties have said, but that is the basis of [[WP:NCORP|corporate notability]]. The article is blatantly [[WP:PROMO|promotional]], and its author has been asked about [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]], and has not yet had time to answer. The article was moved into draft space by a reviewer, but moved back to article space by the author, which is permitted, but does not indicate collaboration. The author then attempted to move the article back to draft space after it was nominated for deletion. That is [[WP:GAME|gaming the system]], but that is a conduct issue, and AFD is a content forum. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 01:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
*:Hi Robert, sorry about moving it to draft, I was unaware that this had to be done through someone else, I've nominated the piece through someone to be draftified. I am not an employee of the company, just have worked in the same area and thought to write an article about what I know. If it could be moved back to draft, I can work on this to improve my article creation skills , i based a lot of the tone on other live software company articles like this one - [[Bluebeam Software, Inc.]], but I obviously need to dig deeper and ask for guidance through the channels that another user pointed out above. Thanks for the help on how to make these better :) [[User:Squaumau|Squaumau]] ([[User talk:Squaumau|talk]]) 14:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
* '''Delete''': as per nom. In total agreement with {{u|DoubleGrazing}} and {{u|Robert McClenon}}. - [[User:Hatchens|Hatchens]] ([[User talk:Hatchens|talk]]) 12:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC) <!--VCB Hatchens-->
** '''Delete''' as per nom. [[WP:ADMASQ]]. [[User:Ari T. Benchaim|Ari T. Benchaim]] ([[User talk:Ari T. Benchaim|talk]]) 09:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||