Content deleted Content added
fix lint issues |
m Replaced deprecated <source> tags with <syntaxhighlight> (via WP:JWB) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6:
A class has been added to {{tl|broken ref}} so that errors on talk and other pages will show if enabled in [[Special:MyPage/skin.css]]. This does not add the page to a maintenance category.
<
span.brokenref {
display: inline;
}
</syntaxhighlight>
For example, an error will show here if this is enabled.<ref></ref>
Line 30:
== Question: Who decided that refs should display a big red message when their personal stylistic preferences aren't followed ==
I'm just wondering who weighed the options and decided that a big unruly red message borking up an article is the means to justify the end - that being "descriptive ref names"? This is the case where if you name a ref with a number, an error message states that the ref name can't be an integer and should be more descriptive. There have been many cases were a year is far more appropriate to use as the name, but can't be because somebody has ensured that this template imposes their personal preferences. - '''[[User:Floydian|<
:The error is generated by the {{cite.php}} software extension— you can look at the code versions to see the authors. When the extension generates an error, it calls a MediaWiki interface page that defines the displayed message.
|