Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive304: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Archiving 5 discussion(s) from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement) (bot Tag: Disambiguation links added |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement) (bot |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 566:
*:{{yo|14Jenna7Caesura}} The editor removed it because it was unsourced, which they rationally explained on the talk page, as they did with all of their removals. You have ZERO reason not to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], ZERO reason to accuse them of transphobia when they are simply trying to maintain the scope that was decided by a formal consensus. It's an extreme, egregious accusation, and one you're throwing around as if it isn't completely nonsensical. You're saying this about ''{{noping|SoWhy}}'', literally one of the Arbitrators whose [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1008369085#Motion:_Remedy_transfer_to_Gender_and_sexuality_shell_case name is on the sanctions] we're working under. I'm not going to play these games, if I see you repeat that or any other personal attack, I will be blocking you indefinitely without further warning. [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 21:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
*I now support a TBAN rather than just a page move ban. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 16:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
==108.34.231.7==
{{hat|Blocked 3 months as a standard admin action. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 11:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning 108.34.231.7===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|FDW777}} 07:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|108.34.231.7}}<p>{{ds/log|108.34.231.7}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons]]
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrisse_Cullors&diff=prev&oldid=1081136380 14:35, 5 April 2022] Adds text to the Patrisse Cullors reading {{tq|In 2022, she was involved in purchasing another Southern California home for nearly $6 million using donation cash}}. At best highly misleading, since it wasn't purchased by her.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1083285096 02:34, 18 April 2022] Claims {{tq|The culprit, from the documents unearthed, is Mrs. Patrisse Cullors and she is being directly accused as the beneficiary of over $6 million dollar homes with misused BLM funds}}.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Avi_Schiffmann&diff=prev&oldid=1081530056 00:28, 8 April 2022] Using Reddit for negative claims about a living person
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Patrisse_Cullors&diff=prev&oldid=1083315752 06:15, 18 April 2022] Claims leaving standard DS warnings are harassment
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFDW777&type=revision&diff=1083315104&oldid=1083313957 06:11, 18 April 2022] Curiously, despite the above sees fit to edit war to retain their unwarranted comments on my talk page
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFDW777&type=revision&diff=1083315936&oldid=1083315224 06:17, 18 April 2022] More edit warring on my talk page
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFDW777&type=revision&diff=1083477343&oldid=1083317418 01:13, 19 April 2022] More edit warring on my talk page
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
n/a
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A108.34.231.7&type=revision&diff=1083243148&oldid=1078354196 Notified]
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
I will explain the problem as simply as I can, summarising what [https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/04/04/home-purchase-by-black-lives-matter-foundation-scrutinized/ Snopes] say (it's already covered at [[Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation#Real estate and salary dispute]]).
In April 2021 [[Patrisse Cullors]], founder of [[Black Lives Matter]] was accused of purchasing several properties using money donated to Black Lives Matter. These accusations were false, as she has significant indepdent sources of incom (this is already covered in her article). In April 2022 it was revealed the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation had spent $6million on a property. There is no direct suggestion in any reliable reference of wrongdoing by Patrisse Cullors in relation to the latter. Despite this being explained repeatedly and at length (I haven't included any Patrisse Cullors talk page posts as diffs, since it's pretty much every post that shows they don't get it), the IP editor still maintains their position (see diff#2) that an accusation of wrongdoing must go in the Patrisse Cullors article.
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:108.34.231.7&diff=prev&oldid=1083523093 Notified]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning 108.34.231.7===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by 108.34.231.7====
====Statement by (username)====
<!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. -->
===Result concerning 108.34.231.7===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*Not so sure DS is useful for an IP, even if allowed ([[WP:NOTHUMAN]]). I blocked the dynamic but seemingly stable IP for three months for DE/BLP issues, as a standard admin action. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 11:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
==Stix1776==
{{hat|Stix1776 is indefinitely banned from circumcision, broadly construed, and may appeal this after 6 months. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights#top|<span style="font-family: MS Mincho; color: black;">話して下さい</span>]]) 00:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning Stix1776===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|MrOllie}} 12:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Stix1776}}<p>{{ds/log|Stix1776}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality#Standard_discretionary_sanctions]] - [[Talk:Circumcision]] has carried a Ds/talk notice template for this case for some time.
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
* First of all, I can't link directly to diffs of some of these because much of the talk page history was deleted because of an attempted outing of KlayCax by Stix1776. Please see the history of [[Talk:Circumcision]] starting on 3 Feburary for deleted edits, as well as [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KlayCax]] for more deleted material. I'll supply the timestamp on the comment where I cannot supply a diff.
#"But, you know, I can quote Wiki policy and discuss sources all day, and it won't change your opinion because you're not here to build an encyclopedia. At some point, you'll be blocked from Wikipedia for these behaviors." 02:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC) Gratuitous personal attack on KlayCax
#"I'm going to come out and say it. You're editing and language style is too similar to KlayCax, and I'm officially reporting this as a sockpuppet account. Your editing history is incredible suspicious." 01:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC) Baseless accusation of OntologicalTree, Battleground mindset
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1082708828 5:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)] "This is clearly has nothing to do with "trimming the lead" and everything to do with KlayCax's clear POV with circumcision. I've seen too many edits where KlayCax unabashedly lies and misrepresents the sources to portray circumcision positively to believe that they genuinely care about the quality of this article. Why insist on removing every small source fact critical for circumcision unless you have a serious POV problem??" - more personal attacks on KlayCax
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1083550067 11:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)] " I've asked you multiple times where the OR word salad ... Clearly this is POV pushing. ... That this is regularly ignored speaks volumes of the confidence of KlayCax and defenders." More personal attacks on KlayCax
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
*Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AStix1776&type=revision&diff=1082713887&oldid=1065387369 16:32, 14 April 2022]
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
<!-- Add any further comment here -->
There has been a lot of [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]]ing on [[Talk:Circumcision]] over the last few months. Full disclosure, I've been the target of a bit of this (I would not consider myself a neutral party), but KlayCax has been the target most often. The personal attacks, attempted outing, and the reverting on vague or nonexistent grounds (see [[Talk:Circumcision#Edits_warring_and_WP:BOLD]] for example) has been getting worse and worse. I think we need a sternly worded warning, if not a topic ban for Stix1776.
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AStix1776&type=revision&diff=1083557754&oldid=1082714997 notification]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning Stix1776===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by Stix1776====
It should be noted that [[User_talk:KlayCax#Please_read_the_sources_before_editing|I'm not the only one saying that KlayCax's behavior could merit a block]]. He's someone who's 49% of edits are circumcision related (I did some analysis in Excel), and 18% are reverts or reverted. The article just lost good article status, and the dispute tag I put up is mostly filled with his OR. Multiple editors have agreed with my concerns and have rolled back some of his edits, only for KlayCax to revert restore himself [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1069635046]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1069647237]. I counted KlayCax adding 146 word additions to the lead, mostly regarding religious justification for circumcision (I use the Who Wrote That app), but he wants to remove a few literally remaining words ethics and non-American disagreement with the procedure to "trim the lead".
I think it's fair that MrOllie's quotes are put in context:
{{tq|"I've asked you multiple times where the OR word salad}} of in these situations, questions surrounding prophylactics, bioethics, group rights, and religious freedom have been brought up" comes up in the source, and you refuse to answer." Perhaps I lost my cool and I apologize. But am I wrong that repeatedly not answering good faith questions is [[WP:TENDENTIOUS]] editing? Would someone mind actually looking at that source?
"'''Please can we have some mediation for all the controversy in this article.'''
{{tq|That this is regularly ignored speaks volumes of the confidence of KlayCax and defenders}}}"
Again, I apologize if I lost my cool. But I would really like some way for this article to move on past obvious content problems that's spelled out in [[Talk:Circumcision#Community_reassessment]] and my dispute tag, and I've often requested alternative dispute measures (not that I'm knowledgeable about them). I don't really want to stay on this article, and frankly I really liked it in November.
{{tq|" I've seen too many edits where KlayCax unabashedly lies and misrepresents the sources"}}. Why not actually add the sources I put in? [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1069635046]
{{tq|"I'm going to come out and say it. You're editing and language style is too similar to KlayCax, and I'm officially reporting this as a sockpuppet account. Your editing history is incredible suspicious".}}
I don't see why me actually reporting suspected sockpuppetry is much different to KlayCax, who just reverts against multiple editors while claiming sockpuppetry. Also I'd just take the topic ban if someone could please check Cblackbu1, because the deleted social media account and KlayCax had literally the same link in edits just a few days apart, several times. (Sorry is this [[WP:OUTING]]?)
I'm not going to blame anyone if they stop reading after this, but I have a collection of diffs where KlayCax removes sourced information that he doesn't like, with no explanation: literally he doesn't like the CDC as source [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prevalence_of_circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1048155376], "throughout society..." [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=1062141972&oldid=1061825646], the quote in the reference [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&diff=prev&oldid=1062578903]. His handful of recent edits that I reverted in [[Circumcision and law]] are worrying.
Again, I apologize if I was too direct. I'm not saying it's an excuse, but I got a similar treatment from an older editor while an admin watched [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Holodomor_in_modern_politics&diff=1010213143&oldid=1010198744], so I assumed this was OK.
Sorry I'm definitely pushing past 500 words now. I earlier read [[WP:WIAPA]] and it doesn't seem to mention mentioning POV issues. If that's the case and I'm wrong, and sorry and I'll not do this anymore.
Sorry again to rope this editor in. I disagree with him a lot but I respect him. This is the language I see that makes me think that it's OK to call out obvious POV issues [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stix1776&diff=1034190597&oldid=1034184763].
Lastly regarding the Outing, it wasn't intentional. It's not obvious that linking an anonymous social media account (similar to 4Chan but not 4Chan) to another editor would be outing. I apologized before and I'll apologize again. But frankly it obviously wasn't malicious.
Last last (really sorry), only points 3-4 of MrOllie's points happened after I was made aware of discretionary sanctions.
====Statement by Prcc27====
Saying you are going to report someone for being a sock puppet does not necessarily seem like a personal attack. As Stix1776 noted, most of the incidents in this report occurred before they were warned about discretionary sanctions. Consequently, this report may be premature. Finally, I would hope that if Stix1776’s actions are being scrutinized, that we also look into other problematic edits on the article and talk page by other users: edit warring, unexplained edits/reverts, personal attacks/incivility, etc. This would help put things into perspective. [[User:Prcc27|Prcc27]] ([[User talk:Prcc27|talk]]) 20:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
====Statement by KlayCax====
{{tq|"I've asked you multiple times where the OR word salad" of in these situations, questions surrounding prophylactics, bioethics, group rights, and religious freedom have been brought up" comes up in the source, and you refuse to answer."}}
I'm still not sure why you're blanketly reverting that sentence. I've repeatedly stated (for the past four months) that ''prophylactics'' refers to the debate within the science community over its efficacy in the prevention of pathologies, ''religious freedom'' and ''group rights'' refer to its intersection with those subjects, and ''bioethics'' refers to the debate over whether it is ethical to perform (usually routine) in given situations. All of which are repeatedly and extensively sourced throughout the article. See ''Cagaanan, 2011; Pinto, 2012; Cohen-Almagor, 2020'' in the [[circumcision]] article for just a few examples.
There's absolutely and clearly nothing problematic about the sentence. I'm perplexed about what you're even contesting. Are you stating that there the debate ''isn't about disputes over its prophylactic efficacy''? That it has ''nothing to do'' with questions surrounding religious freedom, group rights, consent, and therefore ethics?
{{tq|"His handful of recent edits that I reverted in Circumcision and law are worrying."}}
What part of my edits were specifically concerning?
{{tq|" Why not actually add the sources I put in? I'm not going to blame anyone if they stop reading after this, but I have a collection of diffs where KlayCax removes sourced information that he doesn't like, with no explanation: literally he doesn't like the CDC as source, "throughout society..." , the quote in the reference. His handful of recent edits that I reverted in Circumcision and law are worrying. "}}
First of all, all of those changes [Https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&type=revision&diff=1062578903&oldid=1062167579 were extensively explained in the edit summary]:
<blockquote>''Added a section for Samaritanism 2.) Flipped evidence/side effects and positions in the lead for better flow. 3.) The CDC recommended universal (although with consent) circumcision amongst American males in 2014 due to HIV/AIDS. So I removed an outdated reference in the lead saying "none" recommended it. 4.) Made a few other minor changes.''</blockquote>
It wasn't a removal of sourced material "that I didn't like." Both the [[World Health Organization]] and [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] have come out in favor of [Https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478224/|universally circumcising all males] (mainly due to the belief that circumcision acts as a partial prophylaxis against HIV/AIDS transmission and seroconversion) after ''Clayden and Lissauer, 2011'' was published. Because of this fact, it should be profoundly obvious why I removed that quotation from the article: the information had been indisputably rendered ''outdated''.
{{tq|Multiple editors have agreed with my concerns and have rolled back some of his edits}}
In what context?
{{tq|"But he wants to remove a few literally remaining words ethics and non-American disagreement with the procedure to [supposedly] trim the lead."}}
That's not at all [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&type=revision&diff=1082269926&oldid=1082266996 what the edit you reverted does]. (Editors can see more information about the changes made [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Circumcision#Further_revision_talk here].)
{{tq|"Also I'd just take the topic ban if someone could please check Cblackbu1, because the deleted social media account and KlayCax had literally the same link in edits just a few days apart, several times."}}
Like the other people you have repeatedly and without evidence accused me of being, '''I am not Cblackbu1''' and '''can verify myself if requested'''. In fact — if he wants it to be done — I'd be okay with having ''another'' checkuser request performed against me and that account to verify that it is not mine. I would respond more on the matter and examples he gave, but I'm unfortunately aware that my response to him can't be over 500 words. However, I'll finish off by stating that Stix1776's repeated ''ad hominem'' claims that I have an "overwhelming pro-circumcision" bias are easily disproven through a simple look at my edit history. See [Https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&type=revision&diff=1055567211&oldid=1054501604 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&type=revision&diff=1055930280&oldid=1055813378 here] for just two examples of edits of mine showcasing anti-routine circumcision perspectives.
His repeated insults and attacks on me are completely out of hand. [[User:KlayCax|KlayCax]] ([[User talk:KlayCax|talk]]) 22:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
: I would be perfectly okay undergoing another CheckUser request, if requested, and can verify my identity if needed.
: I am not Cblackbu1. [[User:KlayCax|KlayCax]] ([[User talk:KlayCax|talk]]) 22:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
===Result concerning Stix1776===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*Agreed that an indef ban from circumcision is at minimum necessary. What a mess that talkpage is. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights#top|<span style="font-family: MS Mincho; color: black;">話して下さい</span>]]) 16:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
*:Sorry for the delay, RL hit me in ways I wasn't expecting today. Should be able to deal with this in a couple hours. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights#top|<span style="font-family: MS Mincho; color: black;">話して下さい</span>]]) 18:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
*Without comment on the merits (because I can't), I would note this is pretty much impossible to determine unless you have the Oversight bit, which Blade has, but most admin do not. This is due to so much being suppressed rather than RevDeled. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]] 22:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
*:(asked to comment by Blade) - it was suppressed because they were attempting to link KlayCax to off-wiki individuals and accounts; I did check but there's nothing that could have simply been RD'd. {{ppor}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 08:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
*Agree with Dennis. {{ping|The Blade of the Northern Lights}} if you've got enough evidence based on what you can see feel free to do the ban. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 00:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
==Amruth7676==
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning Amruth7676===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|FDW777}} 14:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Amruth7676}}<p>{{ds/log|Amruth7676}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan]]
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1055817925&diff=prev 00:16, 18 November 2021] At {{la|Maratha-Mysore War (1682)}} (all subsequent diffs are this article too) amends the result to the opposite of what the reference (which they removed) says
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1057543236&diff=prev 07:18, 28 November 2021] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1061880537&diff=prev 16:01, 24 December 2021] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1066622952&diff=prev 08:01, 19 January 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1068419914&diff=prev 09:33, 28 January 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1071141206&diff=prev 02:57, 11 February 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1074135135&diff=prev 16:15, 26 February 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1075931438&diff=prev 12:48, 8 March 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1079497046&diff=prev 03:05, 27 March 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1080269468&diff=prev 07:20, 31 March 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1080269468&diff=prev 00:29, 1 April 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1081928074&diff=prev 13:43, 10 April 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1084055069&diff=prev 08:55, 22 April 2022] Reverses the result again
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1084600247&diff=prev 13:34, 25 April 2022] Reverses the result again
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
n/a
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmruth7676&type=revision&diff=1080462523&oldid=1071520370 Notified]
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
Asked by {{ping|RegentsPark}} at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmruth7676&type=revision&diff=1080462787&oldid=1080462523 12:47, 1 April 2022] to stop edit warring at the article and discuss their proposed change, and informeed by me at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmruth7676&type=revision&diff=1084062241&oldid=1080462787 10:08, 22 April 2022] this report would occur if they didn't stop. It didn't, so here we are.
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmruth7676&type=revision&diff=1084604486&oldid=1084062241 Notified]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning Amruth7676===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by Amruth7676====
====Statement by (username)====
<!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. -->
===Result concerning Amruth7676===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
*Apologies, I AE blocked the user for one year from the article before seeing this request. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 16:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
*Don't apologize, you're in the best position to see if a broader sanction is needed, really without other input, it would seem. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2¢</b>]]
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*
== Black Future ==
{{hat
| status =
| result = Blocked for 1 year as an AE block and the indef as a NOTHERE block --[[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 09:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning Black Future===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|Ymblanter}} 07:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Black Future}}<p>{{ds/log|Black Future}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Discretionary sanctions motion (2011)]]
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
Whitewashing the article on the Nazi collaborator [[Stepan Bandera]]
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=1083821639&oldid=1083296135&diffmode=s 20 April] Removing mention of Bandera as Nazi collaborator; says "debated"; the mention is well sourced in the artyicle
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=1083823086&oldid=1083822280&diffmode=source 20 April] Idem, "shouldn't be in the intro"
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=1083823375&oldid=1083823249&diffmode=source 20 April] Trying to portray the situation as if only one scolar calls Vandera a Nazi collaborator
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=1084898227&oldid=1084511672&diffmode=source 27 April] Removal again, no edit summary; this happened after the user read the DS alert
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
* None
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
*Mentioned by name in the Arbitration Committee's Final Decision linked to above.
*Previously blocked as a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict, see the block log linked to above.
*Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on [http://Difflink1 Date] by {{admin|Username}}.
*Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above.
*Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Date]
*Participated in an arbitration request or enforcement procedure about the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Date].
*Successfully appealed all their own sanctions relating to the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Date].
*Placed a {{t|Ds/aware}} template for the area of conflict on their own talk page.
DS alert on 21 April [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Future&diff=1083835557&oldid=1083072329&diffmode=source]; the user subsequently blanked the talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Future&diff=1083909217&oldid=1083835557&diffmode=source]
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint : A user with 1500 edits; probably too many for an indef per [[WP:NOTTHERE]] but should be good enough for a topic ban.
: Indeed, instead of responding here the user has chosen to go for the fifth revert [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=1084946338&oldid=1084900773&diffmode=source] and issues me a template warning for suprise! the edit-warring at [[Stepan Bandera]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ymblanter&diff=1084950301&oldid=1084218817&diffmode=source].--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 15:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
:: Now calling me an "anti-Ukraine troll" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Future&diff=1085113059&oldid=1085112391&diffmode=source]--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 14:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Add any further comment here -->
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
<!-- Please notify the user against whom you request enforcement of the request (you may use {{subst:AE-notice|thread name}}), and then replace this comment with a diff of the notification. The request will normally not be processed otherwise. -->
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Future&diff=1084902208&oldid=1083909217&diffmode=source Diff]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning Black Future===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by Black Future====
<small>Transferred by me from the user's talk page--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 06:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)</small>
*:Okay first off, let me just emphasize how utterly vindictive this user report is.
*:Based on the diffs presented by the user, there is no clear reason to even request moderation since this all could have been settled directly or through consensus building. These are good faith edits that were reverted by edit-warring users who want to [[WP:OWN]] the page, from what I can see. That goes against the entire purpose of this site. Also, my edits were in line with the recommended "Be Bold" strategy: I remove, and when contested, try different means to find a better solution. The only person who is holistically enforcing 1 version of the page is Ymblanter.
*:'''Diffs in question:'''
*:Yes, in Diff #1 I removed a descriptor from the intro because it was a highly controversial statement, and that requires appropriate sourcing (see: [[WP:REDFLAG]]), or more importantly, neutral balance in presentation so as to not push an angle on readers. Nothing wrong with that, or the other edits associated on 20 April. First, "Mhorg" reverted me, he then reverted me a second time. Then "Ploni" tag teamed in and called me a "Nazi-collaboration apologist" - utterly uncivil, and I did not break any rules or conduct codes in the process.
*:I took some time off, came back a week later, and made an edit in line with the reasoning I already presented - bad sourcing and neutrality. That's when Ymblanter imposed this edit war on me. I then engaged him on the talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084947332&oldid=1081718882&diffmode=source here], where he was already arguing with '''another''' user who made the exact same edit as me, below ''another'' user who was also complaining about the page's lack of neutrality. There is a pattern going on - users edit & complain, "owners" revert, and NPOV templates [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1085345927&oldid=1085345522&diffmode=source get deleted] as if there is no problem with the page. He was fully aware of the issue on the page before I even showed up.
*:Diff #3 he cited as a violation was an entirely different matter. The article has 1 source: a social scientist writing a forward for a newsletter. That's horrible sourcing for something like this, and so, (as mentioned, [[WP:REDFLAG]]) "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources." Instead of removing, I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084946338&oldid=1084900773&diffmode=source applied attribution] - the author's name and full quote. This was immediately reverted ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084954790&oldid=1084949389&diffmode=source diff]). If there are other scholars or authorities out there, add more! But don't delete attribution.
*:Diff #4 is a bad faith citation, with a false description: "Removal again, no edit summary" - it was part of a couple edits ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084949389&oldid=1084900773&diffmode=source diff]), which had summaries, which did not remove the content, but moved it to another part of the intro as a good faith compromise. My summary was "moving claim to appropriate section." This is part of consensus building, and if I can't be bold, try different edits or even touch other parts of the article without being reverted, what is going on?
*:'''Ymblanter has engaged in an identical pattern of tendentious editing and warring with users on this very page:'''
*:Not counting the other users involved, Ymblanter alone has shoe-horned this into the intro a number of times that I can see, reverting the intro on multiple users this month: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1082726563&oldid=1082726141&diffmode=source 1] 14 April; [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084900773&oldid=1084898227&diffmode=source 2]; [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084954790&oldid=1084949389&diffmode=source 3]; [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1085147455&oldid=1085147117&diffmode=source 4]. He also did this exact same thing last year, only he was bent on adding "terrorist" to the intro rather than "nazi": [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=997533874&oldid=997530305&diffmode=source 1] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=997537529&oldid=997536179&diffmode=source 2]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=999117338&oldid=999116050&diffmode=source 3], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=999193783&oldid=999186364&diffmode=source 4]
*:'''"Topic Ban":''' Ymblanter first started calling for me to be "banned" on 27 April before he made this report on me [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084900773&oldid=1084898227&diffmode=source here]. This is after I first show up on the page. I'm in no way a single-topic editor here, so to kick me off a topic at first sight seems incredibly reactionary give his past history.
*:He then called for it again above, then mocked me in the summaries that "once you get TBanned, we will remove the template" an hour later, while [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&type=revision&diff=1084966734&oldid=1084964494&diffmode=source trolling the page] to include "One user thanks that" in the template comments to gaslight me. Is this not trolling? Come on, guys.
*:'''Regarding Mhorg's statement:'''
*:As mentioned, Mhorg is involved in this edit war, so his inclusion of other articles I've tried to help needs scrutiny. The first diff he provided said I removed mention of a topic, but this is a lie, as the previous sentence already mentioned it. In the second diff, shows me removing something contradicted from the body of the article - a good faith edit that was reverted by GizzyCatBella (surprise). He then cites a bunch of diffs from Azov Battalion where I was trying to fix the article (which to no surprise, is still a contested issue even today), says I ignored an RFC (which I didnt know existed, then engaged in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azov_Battalion&diff=prev&oldid=1080913696&diffmode=source good faith enforcement of it] after someone told me). It was all over that talk page and compliant with the rules. This is dog piling with a clear motive.
*:'''Comments:'''
*:Look, I dont think I did anything wrong here, and I'm clearly not the only one editing the page, nor the only one getting [[Wikipedia:TAGTEAM|tag teamed]] here. This all could have been handled directly, or on the talk page, but instead I'm being attacked under a clear motive to silence others. "Revert and if they come back, try to get them banned" is not how things should be done.
*:If I'm going to be suspended here, fine, but Ymblanter should have the same done to him. '''''BLKFTR''''' <small>([[User talk:Black Future|tlk2meh]])</small> 01:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
:What a joke this site has become. '''''BLKFTR''''' <small>([[User talk:Black Future|tlk2meh]])</small> 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
====Statement by GizzyCatBella====
Sadly, the behaviour demonstrates that the user is intending to continue reverting repeatedly despite prior warnings given --> [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Black_Future&diff=1079229825&oldid=1079229430&diffmode=source] - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 07:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, that’s what I thought..they continue -->[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepan_Bandera&diff=next&oldid=1084946338&diffmode=source] - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 14:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
<small>(Please note that <s>the data they are trying to erase appears to contradict historical facts </s> (🌍 thanks [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] that was my ESL talking🙂) their erasure contradicts historical facts - here is some quick news read about the subject [[Stepan Bandera|Stephan Bandera]] -->[https://www.timesofisrael.com/hundreds-of-ukrainian-nationalists-march-in-in-honor-of-nazi-collaborator/]) - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 15:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC) </small>
====Statement by Mhorg====
The user appears to be conducting the same actions here:
* Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists: removes parts on the anti-Polish massacres[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organization_of_Ukrainian_Nationalists&diff=prev&oldid=1084109032]
* Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists: removes the "antisemitism" ideology.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organization_of_Ukrainian_Nationalists&diff=prev&oldid=1084106827]
* Ukrainian Insurgent Army: removes parts on the anti-Polish massacres.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army&diff=prev&oldid=1079040466]
* Azov Battalion: removes the definition of "neo-Nazi"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azov_Battalion&diff=prev&oldid=1068163109] ignoring the 2021 RFC.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Azov_Battalion/Archive_2#RfC:_Azov_Battalion] (and again[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azov_Battalion&diff=prev&oldid=1067983800] again[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Corps&diff=prev&oldid=1068110812])--[[User:Mhorg|Mhorg]] ([[User talk:Mhorg|talk]]) 07:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
===Result concerning Black Future===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*Before I noticed this report, I was all set to block Black Future for a week for tendentious editing and edit warring at [[Stepan Bandera]] and harassment at [[User talk:Ymblanter]] (abuse of warning template). I think I'll just go ahead and do that, as a regular admin action. No prejudice to continued discussion of a T-ban or a longer block here, especially in view of {{u|Mhorg}}'s diffs. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 21:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC).
*Looking at {{u|Mhorg}}'s diffs, a topic ban may well be required given the edit warring sans use of the talk page. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 22:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
:*I'd be good with an indefinite T-ban from Eastern Europe. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 15:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC).
::*Should we just indef? Based on their response to the block there’s clearly going to be no reasoning with them. [[User:Swarm|<span style="color:black">'''~Swarm~'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Swarm|<span style="color:DarkViolet">{sting}</span>]]</sup> 23:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
:::*That is also acceptable to me. Note, we'd have to do the usual little dance to accommodate the red tape of DS, which allow a year's block maximum (why??): either a year-long block per DS followed by an indef as a regular admin action, or simply the whole indef as a regular admin action. I'd prefer the first-mentioned, to show that several admins are behind the block. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 08:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC).
{{hab}}
==Shirshore==
{{hat
| status =
| result = Shirshore has been blocked for socking. The next block will probably be indef --[[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 14:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning Shirshore===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|Kzl55}} 18:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Shirshore}}<p>{{ds/log|Shirshore}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Horn_of_Africa#Final_decision]]
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somaliland&diff=prev&oldid=1082411485&diffmode=source 13 April 2022] Shirshore circumventing previous topic ban on [[Horn of Africa]] articles using confirmed sock JohnnyPilger the day after TBAN was confirmed. In this example by blanking a section on an article.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hawiye&diff=prev&oldid=1082816681&diffmode=source 15 April 2022] Confirmed Shireshore sock JohnnyPilger continues to edit on [[Horn of Africa]] articles evading their TBAN.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isaaq_Sultanate&type=revision&diff=1083825062&oldid=1081831337&diffmode=source 21 April 2022] More blanking of sections using confirmed sock JohnnyPilger.
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=1082360053&diffmode=source 12 April 2022] Shirshore indefinitely topic banned from [[Horn of Africa]].
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
*Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=1082360053&diffmode=source 12 April 2022] by {{admin|Ymblanter}}.
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
<!-- Add any further comment here -->
Following the topic ban of Shirshore last month due to disruptive editing. They have activated sleeper socking account JohnnyPilger (first registered June 2021) to evade the TBAN and continue editing on [[Horn of Africa]] articles, including disruptive blanking of sections as seen in the examples linked above. I have filed an SPI which confirmed their socking, but the closing admin gave a lenient 1 week sanctions. And although the closing admin gave a justification for leniency that would be completely understandable in normal circumstances, in my opinion their decision was limited to the socking activity and did not address the evasion of TBAN and general sanctions, which is why I'm filing this report. Shirshore is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, they immediately attempted to circumvent their topic ban using a sleeper account that they've already prepared a year ago. As such I believe a [[WP:NOTHERE]] ban justified in this case. More information can be found in the SPI filing [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shirshore]]. Best regards --[[User:Kzl55|Kzl55]] ([[User talk:Kzl55|talk]]) 18:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
<!-- Please notify the user against whom you request enforcement of the request (you may use {{subst:AE-notice|thread name}}), and then replace this comment with a diff of the notification. The request will normally not be processed otherwise. -->
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shirshore#Notice_of_Arbitration_Enforcement_noticeboard_discussion_2]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning Shirshore===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by Shirshore====
====Statement by (username)====
<!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. -->
===Result concerning Shirshore===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*I don't think there's anything in particular that we need to do here: the sock has been indef blocked and the master blocked for the socking. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 04:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
==Dyldyl9==
{{hat
| status =
| result = Dyldyl9 has been indefinitely blocked as a normal admin action --[[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 14:25, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning Dyldyl9===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|Sideswipe9th}} 23:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|Dyldyl9}}<p>{{ds/log|Dyldyl9}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American_politics_2]] and [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_and_sexuality]]
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
#{{diff2|1084122323}} Dyldyl9 refers to teachers in Florida, teaching age appropriate gender and sexuality lessons, as groomers.
#{{diff2|1086707427}} Dyldyl9 refers to people reposted on [[Libs of TikTok]] as paedophiles, and teachers as groomers.
#{{diff2|1086707733}} Dyldyl9 calls into question the [[2021 United States Capitol attack]], and downplays the severity of it by likening it to [[Inauguration_of_Donald_Trump#Protests_and_demonstrations|protests that occured during the 2017 inauguration]].
#{{diff2|1086709166}} Dyldyl9 adds unsourced information, alleging a journalist released the home and business address of the creator of Libs of TikTok.
#{{diff2|1086710930}} Dyldyl9 removes content that has discussed repeatedly on the Libs of TikTok talk page, and has strong consensus based on what sources say about the account.
#{{diff2|1086711857}} Dyldyl9 engages in a mild personal attack against either myself or {{noping|Praxidicae}}.
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
#{{diff2|1086712612}} Dyldyl9 was blocked for 72 hours, for an edit war involving diffs 4 and 5.
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
* {{diff2|1084380076|GENSEX notice}}
* {{diff2|1084380283|AP2 notice}}
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
<!-- Add any further comment here -->
There are two more diffs I'd like to include, as they demonstrate this behaviour over a substantial period of time, unfortunately they occurred prior to receiving the d/s notices. Although the editor is currently blocked for 72 hours for edit warring, their conduct is below that expected of in a discretionary sanctions topic area, and I suspect this behaviour will continue once the block expires. I don't know if this conduct has reached a level requiring a topic ban, if it has not would a formal warning be appropriate? Also if it's inappropriate to file while the editor is currently blocked for edit warring, I'll happily withdraw it and refile once the block expires. [[User:Sideswipe9th|Sideswipe9th]] ([[User talk:Sideswipe9th|talk]]) 23:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
* {{diff2|1086720756|notification of this request}}
<!-- Please notify the user against whom you request enforcement of the request (you may use {{subst:AE-notice|thread name}}), and then replace this comment with a diff of the notification. The request will normally not be processed otherwise. -->
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning Dyldyl9===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by Dyldyl9====
====Statement by (username)====
<!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. -->
===Result concerning Dyldyl9===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*Looking at the editing so far I'm leaning more towards an indef NOTHERE block rather than a topic ban. Thoughts from others? <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 04:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
*I agree with the NOTHERE recommendation. I took a look at Dyldyl9's contributions and they are largely accusations of bias in various articles. Not helpful and not here. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 14:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
==בר==
{{hat|{{u|בר}} was reminded of (or told about) [[WP:1RR]], which seems to have resolved this matter. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 14:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)}}
<small>''This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. <br />Requests may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.''</small>
===Request concerning בר===
; User who is submitting this request for enforcement : {{userlinks|Nableezy}} 19:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
; User against whom enforcement is requested : {{userlinks|בר}}<p>{{ds/log|בר}}</p>
<!--- Here and at the end, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
;Sanction or remedy to be enforced: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel_articles#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions]] (1RR rule)
<!--- Link to the sanction or remedy that you ask to be enforced --->
; [[WP:DIFF|Diffs]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation ''how'' these edits violate it :
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.-->
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shireen_Abu_Akleh&diff=prev&oldid=1087312661 18:04, 11 May 2022] revert of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shireen_Abu_Akleh&diff=1087307981&oldid=1087307279 this addition]
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shireen_Abu_Akleh&diff=1087315870&oldid=1087315392 18:28, 11 May 2022] revert of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shireen_Abu_Akleh&diff=1087315153&oldid=1087312661 this]
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
N/A
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts]]):
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
*Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%D7%91%D7%A8&diff=prev&oldid=1087313532 Here], though the 1RR is a general sanction that does not require awareness
; Additional comments by editor filing complaint :
The user directs others to discuss this material on the talk page despite it already being discussed on the talk page by all users involved except this one (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shireen_Abu_Akleh&oldid=1087319841#Revert here for current state]). User was asked to self-revert, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%D7%91%D7%A8&diff=1087319624&oldid=1087318678 declined to do so].
:I dont think it needs a sanction if the user will self-revert. As of now there is a 1RR violation and a refusal to self-revert. Self-revert and then no issues. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 19:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)</small>
:Moot at this point, should just be closed with a reminder imo. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17">nableezy</span>]]''' - 14:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)</small>
; Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%D7%91%D7%A8&diff=1087321169&oldid=1087320460 Notified]
<!--- In the line below, replace USERNAME with the username of the editor against whom you request enforcement. --->
===Discussion concerning בר===
<small>''Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 [[Word count#Software|words]] and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. <br />Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.''</small>
====Statement by בר====
*::Hey [[User:RegentsPark]],
*::What is a 1RR reminder?
*::As an administrator, I trust your word. I agree that you will restore my edit. But I can't find any earlier discussion about that on the talk page. [[User:בר|ℬ𝒜ℛ]] ([[User talk:בר|talk]]) 19:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
*:::Okay I'm very sorry, I was not aware of it. In the Hebrew Wikipedia it works differently. To prove I did not mean to harm, I will simply stop writing in this article. Returning to the previous version is totally fine with me. Sorry again! [[User:בר|ℬ𝒜ℛ]] ([[User talk:בר|talk]]) 20:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
====Statement by Selfstudier====
A third editor has now restored the material. Ordinarily for this sort of situation, slap on the wrist, don't do it again would not be out of order. I am a bit unhappy with the tenor of the responses at the user talk page, the edit summaries that were given for the reverts and the user's failure to self revert. [[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier|talk]]) 22:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
====Statement by (username)====
<!-- Copy and paste this empty section below the most recent statement and replace "(username)" with your username. -->
===Result concerning בר===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}}, inform the user on their talk page if they are being sanctioned (eg with {{AE sanction}} or {{uw-aeblock}} and note it in the discretionary sanctions log. -->
*Yeah, violation. But,... meh... does this really need a sanction? I'd say just remind the editor that 1RR be the rule and move on. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 19:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
*:{{ping|Nableezy}}, understood. {{ping|בר}} Would you please self revert? If you do, we can close this with the 1RR reminder, and you can always make your case on the talk page. If you don't, this will definitely begin to be trouble!--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 19:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
*::{{ping|בר}}When you edit the article, a big yellow box pops up that clearly says you cannot make more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. Violations of this can lead to topic bans and/or blocks. Apparently, you made 2 of them. If you revert your removal of the content, we won't treat it as a violation. And, no, I won't restore your content. Instead, you should make your case on the talk page for the removal of the content and try to get consensus (read [[WP:CONSENSUS]]). (BTW, you need to reply in your own section, not here) --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 20:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
*:::{{ping|בר}} You are going to need to self-revert your edit. Nableezy cannot because then it will look like they are violating 1RR. In the interests of ending this, I would do it, but I'm more likely than not to just mess it up. My suggestion is that you do it quickly. Also, please note where I'm moving your comments and make any further comments (unnecessary if you self-revert) there.--[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 20:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
{{hab}}
| |||