Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Knot polynomial: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Knot polynomial]]: Reassigned |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 8:
* Reassigned to [[User:Android79/Desk]]; still in search of expertise. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] 6 July 2005 03:05 (UTC)
**I'll take a look at this, but I'm pretty sure it's outside of my realm of expertise.
* ''Added to [[User:Goeagles4321/Desk]] to try and get some movement here.'' [[User:Stewartadcock|Stewart Adcock]] 22:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
* ''Reassigned to [[User:Flcelloguy/Desk]].'' Please accept or reassign to [[User:Stewartadcock/Desk|me]]. [[User:Stewartadcock|Stewart Adcock]] 20:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
**It looks fine by my standard. Maybe someone cleaned it up already? I'll accept it, though, and see what else needs to be cleaned. [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] |<small> [[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <span style="color:brown;"> note? </span>]]| [[User:Flcelloguy/Desk|Desk]] </small>| [[Wikipedia:Signpost|W]]<sub>[[Wikipedia:Signpost|S]] </sub> 23:25, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
I think it still needs work, particularly the intro and reasoning sections. In the intro:
*Doesn't state is a field of mathematics
*Doesn't define knot
*Doesn't define equivalent knot
If you don't already know what this is about it won't make sense (some of this is later on in the article).
*reasoning section has some non-encyclopedic tone.
From Alexander polynomial down it looks good (but pretty technical).
:If no one else sees a way to improve this let me know and I'll take a crack at ti (but I'll need someone to check my work and make sure I didn't worsen it). [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] 04:32, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
::OK, I'll see what I can do. [[User:Flcelloguy|Flcelloguy]] |<small> [[User talk:Flcelloguy|A <span style="color:brown;"> note? </span>]]| [[User:Flcelloguy/Desk|Desk]] </small>| [[Wikipedia:Signpost|W]]<sub>[[Wikipedia:Signpost|S]] </sub> 13:46, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
It really looks fine to me. It is a little technical, but it's a technical subject; if you can't understand most of it, you probably won't be at the level to be researching it. I don't think it needs any major changes. I'm clearing it off my desk.<br>
[[User:Goeagles4321|Voltaire]]|[[User talk:Goeagles4321|Talk]] 14:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
:Closing this one. Looks ok to me. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(cat scratches)]]</sup> 12:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||