Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity Linux: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:52, 19 March 2022

Latest revision as of 08:04, 24 May 2022

Line 17:

*'''Weak redirect''' to [[Mandriva_Linux#Derivatives]] where it is mentioned. I am not totally sure that mention is due weight, and if we delete it, [[Unity Linux]] should not be redirected per [[WP:SURPRISE]]. But well, it is a verifiable one-liner, so... [[User:Tigraan|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#008000;">Tigraan</span>]]^{[[User talk:Tigraan|<span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me</span>]]} 11:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

*'''Redirect to [[Mandriva Linux#Derivatives]] (with the history preserved under the redirect)''' in lieu of deletion per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Preserving the history will allow the redirect to be undone and the article restored easily if more reviews are found. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 05:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' and then Redirect if needed because there's no need to keep the history and contents if it's in fact not notable, let alone convincing as it's own article, and this software was last active 6 years ago, so it's a long fetch to suggest it could be improved soon; therefore we delete as we have with other articles since it's confirmed as both not notable and unimprovable. [[User:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</fontspan>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">talk</fontspan>]] 05:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

:*NinjaRobotPirate found one review from [[TuxRadar]]. It is possible that more reviews will be found in the future. Redirects are cheap and there is no harm in retaining the history to facilitate a merge or an article restoration if more sources are found. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 05:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}