Locally catenative sequence: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
new article referenced from L-system
 
top: Word (mathematics) redirects to Word (group theory). This is not what is meant here.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:
In [[mathematics]], a '''locally catenative sequence''' is a sequence of [[word (mathematicsformal language theory)|words]] in which each word can be constructed as the concatenation of previous words in the sequence.<ref>{{cite book
| last = Rozenberg
| first = Grzegorz
| coauthors author2= Salomaa, Arto
| title = Handbook of Formal Languages
| publisher = Springer
| date = 1997
| pages = 262
| isbn = 35406042003-540-60420-0}}</ref>
 
Formally, an infinite sequence of words ''w''(''n'') is locally catenative if, for some positive integers ''k'' and ''i''<sub>1</sub>,...''i''<sub>''k''</sub>:
:<math>w(n)=w(n-i_1)w(n-i_2)...\ldots w(n-i_k) \text{ for } n \ge \max(\{i_1, ...\ldots, i_k)\} \, .</math>
 
Some authors use a slightly different definition in which encodings of previous words are allowed in the concatenation.<ref>{{cite book
| last = Allouche
| first = Jean-Paul
| coauthors author2= Shallit, Jeffrey
| title = Automatic Sequences
| publisher = Cambridge
| date = 2003
Line 26:
:<math>S(n)=S(n-1)S(n-2) \text{ for } n \ge 2 \, .</math>
 
The sequence of [[Thue-MorseThue–Morse sequence|Thue-MorseThue–Morse words]] ''T''(''n'') is not locally catenative by the first definition. However, it is locally catenative by the second definition because
:<math>T(n)=T(n-1)\mu(T(n-1)) \text{ for } n \ge 1 \, ,</math>
where the encoding ''&mu;'' replaces 0 with 1 and 1 with &nbsp;0.
 
==References==