Content deleted Content added
→#invoke: not done not done - twice - three strikes? |
→#invoke: links |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 22:
::::Supporting #invoke has nothing to do with code bloat. It is only a couple lines of code. It is not required by [[Template:FXConvert]] or [[Module:Wordify]], it can be worked around, but that is not the best solution. [[User:Trigenibinion|Trigenibinion]] ([[User talk:Trigenibinion|talk]]) 16:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
:::::Asked and answered. Reopening without consensus is not acceptable. No TE in their right mind would make such an edit without the necessary garnered consensus. Rather than spinning your wheels, just go and get the necessary consensus. '''''[[User:Paine Ellsworth|<span style="font-size:92%;color:darkblue;font-family:Segoe Script">P.I. Ellsworth</span>]]''''' , [[Editor|<span style="color:black">ed.</span>]] [[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|<sup>put'r there</sup>]] <small>20:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)</small>
::::::Isn't this the place to garner consensus? [[User:Trigenibinion|Trigenibinion]] ([[User talk:Trigenibinion|talk]]) 21:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
:::::::{{to|Trigenibinion}} yes, this talk page would be the place to garner consensus. Since this talk page may not be monitored by many editors, a [[WP:CAN|neutral invitation]] on other appropriate talk pages would put more eyes on your proposal. For some edits, especially major changes, a formal [[WP:RFC|RfC]] is used to help garner [[WP:consensus|consensus]]. '''''[[User:Paine Ellsworth|<span style="font-size:92%;color:darkblue;font-family:Segoe Script">P.I. Ellsworth</span>]]''''' , [[Editor|<span style="color:black">ed.</span>]] [[User talk:Paine Ellsworth|<sup>put'r there</sup>]] <small>18:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)</small>
| |||