Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:25, 6 June 2012

Latest revision as of 09:04, 5 October 2022

(22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{shortcut|WP:CUOS2012}}

<div style="padding:7px; border:1px solid #CC0000; width:65%; text-align:center; margin:auto;">

<big>The appointment process is now concluded, and the appointment motion has been published below.</big>

<big>Applications to serve as a functionary are being {{#ifexpr:{{CURRENTDAY}} < 18 |accepted until 23:59, 15 June 2012.|reviewed until 19 June 2012 .}}</big>

<div style="padding-top:4px;">The current time and date is {{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC).</div>

</div>

{{ArbCom navigation}}

Line 13:

;Current demand for users with regional knowledge: Because of the increasing activity from the South Asian, Southeast Asian, or Middle Eastern regions, CheckUser applications are particularly sought from people who not only meet our general requirements but also are familiar with the ISPs and typical editing patterns of any of these regions.

Prospective candidates should be familiar with (i) the English Wikipedia CheckUser and Oversight policies; and (ii) the [[wmf:Privacy policy|Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy]] and related documents. They will also have good communication skills and demonstrated ability to work collaboratively. Additionally, CheckUser candidates are expected to be familiar with basic technological issues and [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations|sockpuppet investigation]] tools and techniques. While not a requirement, previous experience with the [[WP:OTRS|Open-source Ticket Resource System]] (OTRS) is beneficial for Oversight candidates.

Applicants must also be:

Line 22:

* willing to [[Wikipedia:Identification|identify]] to the Wikimedia Foundation prior to receiving permissions.

Anyone considering applying should be aware that checkusers and oversighters (and candidates for these permissions) are subject to considerable internal and external scrutiny. The external scrutiny may include attempts to investigate on- and off-wiki activities, and has previously resulted in the personal details of candidates being revealed, and unwanted contact with employers, family, or others. Please be aware that the Arbitration Committee is unable to prevent such off-wiki activities from occurring or off-wiki distribution and discussion of personal information. This risk will continue if the candidate is successful in their candidacy.

Further details on the appointment process may be found [[#Appointment process|below]].

Line 29:

:''Dates are provisional and subject to change''

*'''Applications: 6 June to 15 June'''<p>Candidates self-nominate by email to {{NoSpamEmail|arbcom-en-c|lists.wikimedia.org}}. Each candidate will receive an application questionnaire to be completed and returned to the arbcom-en-c mailing list. This should include a nomination statement, to a maximum of 250 words, for inclusion on the candidate's nomination sub-page(s).

*'''Review period by the Arbitration Committee: 16 June to 19 June'''<p>During this period, the Arbitration Committee will review applications, notify the candidates going forward for community consultation, and create candidate sub-pages as necessary. The pages will be transcluded to the Candidates section below prior to the community consultation period.

*'''Community consultation: 20 June to 28 June'''<p>The nomination statements are published and the candidates invited to answer standard questions and any additional questions the community may pose. Simultaneously, the community is invited to comment on the suitability or unsuitability of each candidate. These comments may either be posted publicly on the candidates' pages or submitted privately by email to {{NoSpamEmail|arbcom-en-c|lists.wikimedia.org}}. Editors are encouraged to include a detailed rationale, supported by relevant links where appropriate.

*'''Appointments: by 11 July'''<p>The committee shall review all the comments submitted and other relevant factors before finalizing [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Committee resolutions|an internal resolution]], at which point the appointments will be published. The successful candidates will be required to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation prior to receiving the permissions.

=== Appointment motion ===

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has resolved to appoint four editors to the [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|CheckUser]] team and eight editors to the [[Wikipedia:Oversight|Oversight]] team pursuant to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight|CheckUser and Oversight appointment procedures]] and following the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments|2012 CUOS appointments]] process.

Subject to the editors named below providing identification satisfactory to the Wikimedia Foundation (if they have not already done so), the Arbitration Committee hereby resolves to:

(a) appoint the following editors as checkusers:

* {{admin|DeltaQuad}}

* {{admin|DoRD}}

* {{admin|Ponyo}}^†

* {{admin|Salvio giuliano}}^†

(b) appoint the following editors as oversighters:

* {{admin|Foxj}}

* {{admin|Mentifisto}}

* {{admin|NuclearWarfare}}

* {{admin|Ponyo}}^†

* {{admin|Salvio giuliano}}^†

* {{admin|Snowolf}}

* {{admin|Someguy1221}}

* {{admin|Worm That Turned}}

: <small>† Previously identified member of the [[Wikipedia:Audit Subcommittee|Audit Subcommittee]] who will retain the specified permission(s) upon the conclusion of their terms.</small>

The committee thanks the other candidates ([[User:Mlpearc|Mlpearc]], [[User:Tiptoety|Tiptoety]]); those who applied but were not put forward as candidates; and the community in bringing this appointment process to a successful conclusion.

The committee also thanks {{user|LessHeard vanU}}, who has recently resigned as an oversighter, for his longterm dedication to the project, and wishes him well in his future endeavours. As well, the committee thanks {{user|John Vandenberg}}, who has also resigned his checkuser and oversight permissions, for his work as a checkuser, an oversighter, and for his work as an arbitrator; John continues to make contributions in multiple areas within the WMF projects and as an executive member of Wikimedia Australia.

:'''Supporting:''' Casliber, Courcelles, David Fuchs, Hersfold, Jclemens, Kirill Lokshin, Newyorkbrad, PhilKnight, Risker, Roger Davies, SirFozzie.

:'''Not voting/Inactive:''' AGK, SilkTork, Xeno

For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Risker|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker|talk]]) 02:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

:'''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 18#2012 CheckUser and Oversight appointments & personnel changes|Archived discussion]]'''

==Candidates==

<!--

*** To comment on candidates, please use section edit buttons to edit the appropriate candidate subpage(s) ***

-->

===CheckUser===

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments/CU}}

===Oversight===

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2012 CUOS appointments/OS}}

==Results==

*'''Appointments: by 6 July'''<p>The committee shall review all the comments submitted and other relevant factors before finalizing [[Wikipedia:Arbitration

{{Ivmbox|1=

Committee/Procedures#Committee resolutions|an internal resolution]], at which point the appointments will be published. The successful candidates will be required to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation prior to receiving the permissions.

{{Excerpt|Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 8|2012 CheckUser and Oversight appointments & personnel changes}}

}}

{{CUOS appointments navbox}}