Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2022 CUOS appointments/CU: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 23:06, 5 October 2022 view source Nosebagbear (talk \| contribs) 24,097 edits →Comments (Firefly): the low-hanging fruit Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 08:18, 6 October 2022 view source Primefac (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 213,292 edits m Protected "Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2022 CUOS appointments/CU": community consult phase closed ([Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite))
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: <!-- Sections created with [[Template:CUOS appointments]] --> {{atop\|The community consultation phase has ended. [[User:Primefac\|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac\|talk]]) 08:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)}} ====Blablubbs==== {{admin\|Blablubbs}} Line 152 ⟶ 153: *I believe Firefly has the right stuff and will do well. Being a relatively new admin is not so much of a barrier, as long as they're prepared to learn, which I think is likely. I can't comment on any allegations of off-wiki shenanigans; I trust Arbcom will look at that. -- [[user:zzuuzz\|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz\|(talk)]]</sup> 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC) ---- {{abot}}