Wikipedia:Dispute Resolution Improvement Project/Newsletter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tweak |
Sheep8144402 (talk | contribs) m →'''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1): fix font tags using AWB |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
=='''The Olive Branch''': A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #2)==
:''To add your name to the newsletter delivery list, please sign up [[Wikipedia:Dispute_Resolution_Improvement_Project/Newsletteroptin|here]]''
;Background
Line 11 ⟶ 13:
[[File:Wizard DRN stage 1.png|250px|thumb|right|Stage one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request|dispute resolution noticeboard request form]]. Here, participants fill out a request through a form, instead of through wikitext, making it easier for them to use, but also imposing word restrictions so volunteers can review the dispute in a timely manner.]]
Leading off from the survey in April and the evaluation in May, several changes to the [[WP:DRN|dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN)]] were proposed. Rather than using a wikitext template to bring disputes to the Dispute Resolutions Noticeboard (DRN), editors used a [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request|new javascript form]]. This form was simpler to use, but also standardised the format of submissions and applied a word limit so that DRN volunteers could more easily review disputes. A [[Template:DR case status|template]] to summarise, and a robot to maintain the noticeboard, were also created.
As a result of these changes, volunteers responded to disputes in a third of the time, and resolved them 60% faster when compared to May. Successful resolution of disputes increased by 17%. Submissions were 25% shorter by word count.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_Resolution_Improvement_Project Dispute Resolution Noticeboard Statistics - August compared to May]</ref>
Line 18 ⟶ 20:
;Proposed changes
Given the success of the past efforts at Dispute Resolution (DR) reform, the current RFC proposes we implement:
1) A '''submission gadget for every DR venue''' tailored to the unique needs of that forum.
Line 38 ⟶ 40:
3) Additionally, we're seeking any ideas on '''how we can attract and retain more dispute resolution volunteers'''.
'''Please share your thoughts at the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Reforming_dispute_resolution
--''The Olive Branch''
Line 46 ⟶ 48:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Attention'''
|-
|'''My apology to anyone who felt receiving a message about this newsletter was spam or disruptive in any way.
|}
Line 95 ⟶ 97:
|-
! scope="row" | First response time
| 16 hrs 36 mins || <10 hrs || 5h 29 min || <
|-
! scope="row" | # of active volunteers
| 25 - 1 to 12 ratio with 207 participants (average 1.47 per thread with 42 threads) || 30+ || 20 - 1 to 11 out of 177 total editors (average 2.85 per thread with 52 threads) || <
|-
! scope="row" | Timeframe thread open
| 8.6 days || 5 - 7 days || 2d 10 hr - 3 d 11 hr for disputes that were addressed || <
|-
! scope="row" | Success rate
| 47.61% || 70%+ || 64.29% || <
|-
|}
Line 119 ⟶ 121:
--''The Olive Branch'' 23:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
[[Category:Wikipedia dispute resolution]]
|