Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/March: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:55, 17 March 2022

Latest revision as of 16:44, 1 January 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 24:

==={{tl|Czechoslovakia-stub}}===

{{sfp top|create upmerged Czechoslovakia-stub, proceed with caution}}

Former country stub. [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Czechoslovakia&basedeep=3&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en CatScan found 67 articles].--_{<span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<fontspan style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </fontspan>]]</span>} 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

*When youtake out the less than 4 links it goes down to 50, also see comment below. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 20:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Line 31:

:'''Support''' - also, any chance of DDR stubs? --[[User:MacRusgail|MacRusgail]] ([[User talk:MacRusgail|talk]]) 16:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

::We should likely start by introducing [[:Category:East Germany]] as main category for [[East Germany]]. --_{<span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<fontspan style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </fontspan>]]</span>} 02:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>

==={{tl|Austria-Hungary-stub}}===

{{sfp top|create as AustriaHungary-stub}}

Former country stub. [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Austria-Hungary&basedeep=3&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en CatScan found 156 articles].--_{<span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<fontspan style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </fontspan>]]</span>} 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

*I have nothing against former nation stubs. However having looked at the first 10 articles I think 6/7 of them are probably not related to the Empire. If 60 articles can be found, then I think a note on the category to the effect that only articles related to the Empire. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 20:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

**Indeed, the category system fails somewhat here, but still I can see quite a few articles that could use this category. After, AH was a modern European country with over a century of history - I am sure there will be more then 50 stubs for years to come. Here are some subcategories that total about 40 stubs: [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=+Culture+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=History+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en], [http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&basecat=Politics+of+Austria-Hungary&basedeep=2&mode=ss&size=512&stubop=or&links=4&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=en]. Further, I can point out one error with current stub categories: [[:Category:Austro-Hungarian people]] is underutilized; I can think of many bios of Polish people from AH partition that were never categorized in it as I (having written dozens of such bios) didn't realize it existed. I could've used such an AH stub on many an article. --_{<span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<fontspan style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </fontspan>]]</span>} 02:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

*I'm a little uneasy about starting stub types for "defunct countries", as it were, but if we do, this should comply with the naming conventions for stubs and be at {{tl|AustriaHungary-stub}} - or even at {{tl|AustroHungarianEmpire-stub}}, since that seems to be more pertinent to what the stub would actually be for. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 22:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

*As the name of the nation is [[Austria–Hungary]], I think it AustriaHungary-stub would be more correct.--_{<span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<fontspan style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk </fontspan>]]</span>} 02:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>

==={{tl|Earwig-stub}}===

Line 286:

===Speedy [[:Category:Norway tram stubs|Cat:Norway tram stubs]]===

{{sfp create}}

{{tl|Norway-tram-stub}} has surpassed 60 transclusions, and is increasing rapidly. <fontspan facestyle="font-family:serif;">[[User:Arsenikk|<fontstrong colorstyle="color:green;"><strong>Arsenikk</strong></font>]] ^{[[User_talk:Arsenikk|<fontsup colorstyle="color:grey;">(talk)</fontsup>]]}</fontspan> 20:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

:Support, though this will leave Euro-tram a bit short, any idea if there are other articles hanging about. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 10:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Line 521:

===Goverment Worker===

{{sfp nocreate}}

I created this before realising I shoudl have done it here. I have noticed that some people are being classed as politicians, where they're more bordering on the line of administration etc. This is my proposed one: <nowiki>{{Usagov}}</nowiki> I know the wording could be a little better - buty I'd work on that if there was general consensus it is okay... [[User:TheUnfortunate|TheUnfortunate]] ([[User talk:TheUnfortunate|talk]]) 10:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:Is {{Tl|US-gov-bio-stub}} or {{Tl|US-poli-bio-stub}} of any use. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 19:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Woops, I didn't see those >.< I think that not holding an elected position or whatnot sounds more like that have attempted to rather than just being a receptionist, for example... [[User:TheUnfortunate|TheUnfortunate]] ([[User talk:TheUnfortunate|talk]]) 20:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)