Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-05/Features and admins: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:08, 16 March 2022

Latest revision as of 03:53, 31 January 2023

Line 4:

:Thanks for your kind words, Ssilvers. Concerning "subjective comment", I wanted to bring out the human element of these rich and competitive processes—the fact that real people have opinions there—as well as printing those interesting comments by nominators. The "Choices of the week" are clearly marked as opinions, and ''The Signpost'' has the journalistic capacity to give light to good-faith opinions. The message, I guess, is: hey, what do you, the reader, think? Go have a look at these excellent articles, lists, images, and see if you agree or disagree with those opinions. [[User:Tony1|<span style="color:darkgreen;">'''Tony'''</span>]] [[User talk:Tony1|<span style="color:darkgreen;">(talk)</span>]] 17:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to applaud the editors involved for the overhaul; introducing attribution, blurbs and critical commentary has made what used to be a dull, brief list into a must-read. Contrary to Ssilvers, I think an injection of a modicum of competitve spirit is a positive development, and the choices of the week will be understood by all to be somewhat subjective in any case. Commendations, all. [[user:Skomorokh|<span style="color: black;"><fontspan facestyle="font-family:New York;">Skomorokh</fontspan></span>]] 18:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Great work, Tony! I especially enjoyed the sentence or two summarizing the new Featured Articles. However, I found myself clicking on the links to all the new Featured Pictures, and I really did like the format used until last week in which all of them were included. Perhaps the new format with only one featured picture is less cluttered, but I really enjoyed seeing all the new FPs on this page. They are all such beautiful images! Thanks again and keep up the good work! [[User:TFCforever|TFCforever]] ([[User talk:TFCforever|talk]]) 23:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)