Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchuminWeb: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 46:
=== Statement by Youreallycan===
He is aware of this and had not commented at all - he failed to comment at his RFC user and here also- he claims he is close to ''putting up the retired template'' - I say remove his advanced permissions immediately - his lack of communication and effort to explain his edits which as an admin he has a responsibility to do are damning = deysop - I will add that I agree completely with his cautious interpretation of the wikipedia foundations copyright and non free use statements but he needs to comment to defend them and his admin actions here. [[User:Youreallycan|<
===Question from Beyond My Ken===
Line 118:
===Comment by Previously involved and how-did-I-miss-the-Rfc KillerChihuahua===
In October of 2011, I had my one and only encounter with SchuminWeb; in that encounter he was high-handed, dismissive, insulting, and generally obnoxious to the several admins and editors (myself as one) who tried to discuss an action of his, which was within the letter of the law, I suppose, but amazingly [[Wikipedia:Cluocracy|CLUE]]less. The discussion on his talk page was moved, then blanked, then redirected, but you can see it (albeit with the retired banner above, as that is templated across all his pages using an earlier template) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SchuminWeb/Archive_32&oldid=456995651#Changes%20to%20Template:Di-replaceable%20fair%20use here], scroll down to the first section, ''Changes to Template:Di-replaceable fair use'' in which Future Perfect at Sunrise, followed by myself and others, voiced concern that he had completely and utterly negated the speedy for fair use, by his changes in the verbiage of the template, hamstringing the speedy process for fair use, which would of course have grave concerns for all of Wikipedia. There was [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive724#Changes_to_Template:Di-replaceable_fair_use|further discussion]] on ANI, in which IDHT was the response. The issue is the same as in the Rfc; high-handed admin action, and hostility to all who have concerns, which he then later buried. I have grave concerns about allowing this admin to "retire" and be able to come back to Wikipedia with the bits intact, without having addressed any concerns at all; this seems to have been a tactic used in the past and I have no reason to believe that he will come back with any change in attitude or approach; his past history would indicate the opposite will occur. Recommend removing admin bits under a cloud, forcing a new Rfa. We are not hard up enough for admins that we need accept this type of deafness to community concerns. One puppy's opinion. [[User:KillerChihuahua|Killer]][[User talk:KillerChihuahua|<
===Comment by Collect===
| |||