Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Edit Top: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:25, 10 March 2007

Latest revision as of 06:03, 4 February 2023

(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 58:

Hi, I put the code in my monobok page [[User:Pgan002/monobook.js]], but I can't see the edit links at the top. I am using the monobook skin. Any idea how to make it work? Thanks! -[[User:Pgan002|Pgan002]] 23:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

:Try first [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Pgan002/monobook.js&action=purge purging the server cache], then bypassing the browser cache (Ctrl + F5 for IE, Ctrl + Shift + R for FX). [[User:Pyrospirit|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">Pyrospirit</fontspan>]] ^{[[User talk:Pyrospirit|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">Flames</fontspan>]] [[Special:Contributions/Pyrospirit|<fontspan colorstyle="color:orange;">Fire</fontspan>]]} 04:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

== Breaks on secure.wikimedia.org ==

The href portion of this script breaks when used on secure.wikimedia.org. What ''should'' be linked to is, for example, <nowiki>https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Zen_of_Wikipedia&action=edit&section=0</nowiki>, but what you actually get <nowiki>https://secure.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Zen%20of%20Wikipedia&action=edit&section=0</nowiki>.

In other words, instead of linking to root (/), secure.wikimedia.org needs a 'wikipedia/en/'. --[[User talk:Gwern |Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern | (contribs)]] 18:46 [[17 June]] [[2007]] (GMT)

:Considering that the author of this script made 13 edits this year, I wouldn't hope for a quick answer. Would you like to take a look at some other "Edit Top" scripts, for example [[User talk:Alex Smotrov/edittop.js|Simple Edittop]], which should work enywhere? ∴ [[User:Alex Smotrov|Alex Smotrov]] 04:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

== Redundant? ==

Does ''[[Special:Preferences]]>Gadgets>User interface gadgets>Add an [edit] link for the introduction section of a page'' make this script redundant? [[User:Jnestorius|jnestorius]]^{([[User talk:Jnestorius|talk]])} 22:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:I would say yes. This script simply uses a different approach for the same task. Also it automatically adds /* Intro */ to the edit summary, but this doesn't seem like a good idea to me, since this creates a fake "→" link to nonexisting #Intro section. —[[User:Alex Smotrov|AlexSm]] 06:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)