Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Archive open editing session: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 73:
::::And I think few people have reacted negatively to the bulleted list format. --[[User:AudeVivere|Aude]] (<small>[[User:AudeVivere|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/AudeVivere|contribs]]</small>) 18:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
:<
:How is it constructive to insert styling that defies consensus, and why shouldn't it be removed?
:<
:No, more than "a select few" oppose the inclusion of portal icons.
:<
:The opposition to portal icons—''any'' portal icons—is strong.
:<
:There is no consensus that the addition of icons will make Wikipedia "more user-friendly."
:<
:The people most likely to be adversely affected by the presence of portal icons are those with low display resolutions and/or large text sizes. Are people with old/inexpensive computers and/or poor eyesight society's "elite"?
:<
:No, it isn't. The inclusion of '''any''' images larger than the bullets '''will''' increase the likelihood of wrapping. The icons sometimes end up on different lines than the corresponding links, and this looks '''''terrible'''''. —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 20:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Line 187:
== A question ==
How were you able to hide the titlebar and tagline? I have failed to see anything in the code on this. How did this occur in the history, too? I am amazed how this could be possible. --'''[[User:Wcquidditch|<
:{{tl|hidden}}. Or, more precisely, {{tl|hidden begin}} and {{tl|hidden end}}.--[[User:HereToHelp|HereToHelp]] ([[User talk:HereToHelp|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/HereToHelp|contribs]]) 04:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
::no, the hidden templates are for the "show/hide" section link. i don't know how the page's titlebar is being hidden though. --[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 06:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Line 203:
*find / search box
** The negative vertical spacing on the label (from [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] - #bodySearchMP label { display: block; font-size: 95%; font-weight: bold; '''margin-bottom: -.2em;''' }) worries me. This is under Firefox 1.5 using Monobook. [[User:Alphax|Alph]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<
*article count
Line 295:
Hello to everyone,
I have suggested this before and I'm here to do it again. Remove the "the free encyclopedia" slogan. It just takes away from the level of respect people have. By having that people won't think this is a real encyclopedia, it'll sound like a joke. I just don't think we should keep it. Thank you for your time<br>
--([[User:Aytakin|<
:I really don't see how you came to that absurd conclusion, and I doubt many will agree with you. --[[User:81.104.41.42|81.104.41.42]] 17:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Line 451:
<pre>*[[Portal:Art|<span title="Architecture, Comics, Film, Dance, Literature, Music">Art</span>]]</pre>
*[[Portal:Art|<span title="Architecture, Comics, Film, Dance, Literature, Music">Art</span>]]
<sub>→[[User:AzaToth|<
:It won't make the coding any clearer, and will interfere with Lupin's popups. That said, I see no read issues. Ideally, hover text could be added in some other way. -- [[User talk:Ec5618|Ec5618]] 17:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Line 960:
::::::::[http://www.google.com/custom?sa=Google+Search&domains=wikipedia.org&sitesearch=wikipedia.org WP specific Google] and [http://www.wikiwax.com/ WikiWax] are wonderful. How did we get ''there''? I rv'd Renata3's edit for the reason stated in my edit summary. That was my first problem and so it got to the edit summary. The extra searchbox, the icons and the tossing out of what I thought represented a sure and steady migration towards a consensus draft being summarily tossed doesn't seem the way things should be introduced. [[User:Hydnjo|hydnjo]] [[User talk:Hydnjo|talk]] 04:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
::::::::Renata: <span class="plainlinks">[http://lifeisunfair.net/firefox_view3.png This]</span> is how your header displayed in Firefox. You ''did'' check the page in browsers other than your usual one (IE?), didn't you? —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 04:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
:::::::::That's pretty close to how it looked using Safari. [[User:Hydnjo|hydnjo]] [[User talk:Hydnjo|talk]] 04:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
|