Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Courcelles: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:31, 5 October 2011

Latest revision as of 22:49, 4 February 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<noinclude>{{pp-semi|small=yes}}</noinclude>

====Courcelles====

Line 24 ⟶ 23:

=====Questions for this candidate=====

Being a checkuser, would you be willing to continue to help with the Checkuser backlog at [[WP:ACC]] as there are usually up to 6 requests waiting about 5 days+? -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">DQ</span>]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;"> (t) </span>]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad|<span style="color:blue;"> (e)]]</font></font></fontspan>]] 19:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

: '''A:''' I'm never great at remembering to check ACC, but I think I've been willing to take a look every time someone has poked me that there was work needed there. I'm around on IRC, and there's a backlog, just poke me, and I'll come take a look. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Would you be proactive in looking at the open cases at SPI to see if they could use a checkuser after your term ends on AUSC? -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">DQ</span>]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;"> (t) </span>]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad|<span style="color:blue;"> (e)]]</font></font></fontspan>]] 19:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

: '''A:''' Of course. The clerk system is a great one at workflow management, but CU's are, and should be, looking at other cases on the SPI page to see if their services would be useful. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 21:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Line 50 ⟶ 49:

:''Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing {{NoSpam|arbcom-en-b|lists.wikimedia.org}}''

*In my limited observations of Courcelles I have found him to be an articulate and good faith editor with the significant authorities that he has on WP, so I support him continuing in CU and OS. [[User:Pine|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#01796F;"><b>Pine</b></fontspan>]][[User talk:Pine|^talk]] 19:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

*Courcelles is a well seasoned member of the AUSC and I would fully support for turning in the audit flag (or keeping it for that matter) for the CU flag. -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">DQ</span>]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;"> (t) </span>]] <font color="blue">[[Special:EmailUser/DeltaQuad|<span style="color:blue;"> (e)]]</font></font></fontspan>]] 17:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

*Courcelles strikes me as both neutral and transparent in their actions. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] ^{[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]} 12:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

*I have a generally favorable impression of Courcelles' judgment in his current roles. If he wants to continue doing CU and Oversight work after rotating off the audit committee, that should be beneficial to Wikipedia. --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 02:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

*Really another no-brainer. Very helpful as a checkuser. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 04:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

*Abuse response on users has been stopped with some exceptions, such as {{U|JAT6634}}, a couple weeks ago by me. ~~[[User:ebe123|<span style="text-shadow:#ff9996 3px 3px 2px;"><span style="color:#21421E;font-weight:bold">Ebe</span><span style="color:#000000">123</span></span>]]~~ (+) <small>{{Su|p=[[User talk:Ebe123|<small style="color:#0000FF">talk</small>]]|b=<small>[[Special:Contributions/Ebe123|Contribs]]</small>}}</small> 22:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)