Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections July 2004/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:41, 7 August 2004

Latest revision as of 23:19, 4 February 2023

(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)

Line 1:

This page lists the candidates who stood in the upcoming[[Wikipedia:Arbitration electionCommittee toElections fillJuly the2004|Arbitration Committee Elections July 2004]] for two missing seats on the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration committee]].

IfAll you areusers interested in thisthe position, pleasewere addinvited ato add brief candidate statementstatements belowto this page. ThisThese shouldwere to be no longermore than 250 words and shouldcandidates were asked to outline yourtheir views on banning and how strict youthey feelfelt the Arbitration Committee should be.

'''THIS PAGE IS NOW FROZEN.''' NewSince the election is over, new candidacies are no longer permitted and will be removed. YouThe canresults of the vote are at [[SpecialWikipedia:ArbComVoteArbitration Committee Elections July 2004]].

==[[User:172|172]]==

Line 104:

I have many kind people to thank for invaluable [[User:Merovingian/archive|advice]] given to me throughout my tenure here.

Let it be known that I have '''no''' animosity toward any of my opponents. I welcome any of their questions on [[User talk:Merovingian|my talk page]]. [[User:Merovingian|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">Merovingian]]</fontspan>]]<big>&#9997;</big>[[User talk:Merovingian|<fontspan colorstyle="color:orange;">Talk</span>]] 11:06, Jul 31, 2004 (UTC)

==[[User:Lir|Lir]]==

I am strongly opposed to sysop abuses; we need non-sysops on the arbitration committee. I have been around for almost two years, and have edited thousands of articles. [[User:Lir|Lirath Q. Pynnor]]

Line 112:

I want to see the arbitration committee focus on being excellent arbiters of what is and what is not productive for the WP project, looking a reasonable amount of time into the future. To this end, I think the AC should respond '''quickly''' and '''prolifically''' to requests, and should shy away from micromanaging ''sentencing'' and endless agonizing over ''intent''.

More effective than explicit banning, for some fixed period : removing the standard restrictions on interactions with a given user/article -- for instance, allowing automatic reversion of a user's edits to certain topics; or allowing a user to be banned by any sysop for any reason (allowing for other sysops to disagree & unban, or hammer out the details of ban duration [unlike an explicit, irrevocable ArbComm Ruling]) -- continuing to leave sentencing decisions in the hands of the broader body of users|admins. More comments and questions can be found on [[User_Talk:Sj#ArbComm|my talk page]]. [[User:Sj|+sj]][[User Talk:Sj|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#ff6996;">+</fontspan>]]

[[Category:Wikipedia ArbCom elections archive]]

[[Category:Wikipedia Arbitration Committee Elections July 2004|Candidate statements]]

[[Category:Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections candidate statements|2004]]