Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2L programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:19, 18 September 2006

Latest revision as of 02:11, 5 February 2023

(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete'''. —[[User:Centrx|Centrx]]→[[User talk:Centrx|''talk'']]&nbsp;&bull; 00:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

===[[2L programming language]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}}

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&diff=prev&oldid=75309566 here]. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen [[P′′]] (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". [[User:Leibniz|Leibniz]] 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', no demonstrated notability.--[[User:Isotope23|Isotope23]] 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.

{| class="messagebox plainlinks" style="text-align:left; width:100%;"

|style=""| [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|50px]]

|style="padding-left:.2em;"|''Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.''

Previous [[Esoteric programming language]]-related [[Wikipedia:deletion debates|deletion debates]]:

*'''No result''' [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Esoteric_programming_language_related|Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004]]

*'''Keep''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lazy_K&oldid=16961621 Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004]

*'''Delete''' [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obfuscated Weird Language|Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005]]

*'''Delete 1, keep 2''' [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language|Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006]]

*'''No result''' [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Morgan-Mar|Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006]]

*'''No consensus''' [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ook!_programming_language|Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006]]

*'''Delete most''' [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Esoteric_programming_languages|Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006]]

*'''Overturn and relist''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&oldid=75310066 Deletion Review, September 7 2006]

|}

:--[[User:ais523|ais523]] 15:47, 18 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

* '''Delete - already merged''' whilst the concept of overloading by direction is interesting, it's technically nothing new, and not something that new works would be based upon. Lack of verification is an issue. [[User:LinaMishima|LinaMishima]] 02:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

*Speedy keep, already merged. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

* '''Redirect''' Already merged. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 11:44, 19 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

**'''Comment''' - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><span style="color:green;">e</span></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

***If you read the penultimate debate in my modified {{[[Template:multidel|multidel]]}} above, you'll see that [[User:LinaMishima]] is planning to merge all the minor esolangs to [[List of esoteric programming languages]], in which case the history is needed for copyright reasons, which is why I'm advocating a redirect. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 17:17, 19 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

****Yeah, I figured that out. But as I've now commented on other AFDs for esolangs, if these are not used, not notable, and just something invented at school in one day, then they shouldn't even be on the list, as they are nothing beyond a nerdjoke. Speedy Keep is still a ridiculous vote, given the reasoning which suggests a delete or redirect. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><span style="color:green;">e</span></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><span style="color:green;">e</span></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Per my comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages]]. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 19:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Not notable, not encyclopedia material. The external link doesn't work. '''[[User:RickReinckens|RickReinckens]] 05:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)'''

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>