Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2L programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:08, 30 September 2006

Latest revision as of 02:11, 5 February 2023

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 32:

*Speedy keep, already merged. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

* '''Redirect''' Already merged. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 11:44, 19 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

**'''Comment''' - What the fuck has it been merged to, can someone actually explain their votes? And if it is already merged, why then, is Kappa voting Speedy Keep? Has something been merged here? What is Ais523 suggesting we redirect to? - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">e</fontspan></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

***If you read the penultimate debate in my modified {{[[Template:multidel|multidel]]}} above, you'll see that [[User:LinaMishima]] is planning to merge all the minor esolangs to [[List of esoteric programming languages]], in which case the history is needed for copyright reasons, which is why I'm advocating a redirect. --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 17:17, 19 September 2006 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])

****Yeah, I figured that out. But as I've now commented on other AFDs for esolangs, if these are not used, not notable, and just something invented at school in one day, then they shouldn't even be on the list, as they are nothing beyond a nerdjoke. Speedy Keep is still a ridiculous vote, given the reasoning which suggests a delete or redirect. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">e</fontspan></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Anything of worth is covered in Brainfuck. No assertion of anything. Speedy Keep is the stupidest vote I've seen. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">e</fontspan></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Per my comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages]]. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 19:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Not notable, not encyclopedia material. The external link doesn't work. '''[[User:RickReinckens|RickReinckens]] 05:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)'''

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>