Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog analysis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:18, 26 November 2007

Latest revision as of 17:34, 5 February 2023

(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''<span style="color:red;">d</span>elete''' as [[WP:V|unsourced]]. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 12:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

===[[Blog analysis]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}

:{{la|Blog analysis}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog analysis|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 26#{{anchorencode:Blog analysis}}|View log]])</noinclude>

Original research essay witwith no sources. [[User:Ridernyc|Ridernyc]] ([[User talk:Ridernyc|talk]]) 15:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

:I think this could be sourced. For Example, a quick and dirty Google search yields this Ars Technica link: [http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060705-7197.html US military turns to "blog analysis" for intelligence]. I say '''keep''' or '''redirect''' to [[Data mining]].--[[User:TexasDex|<span style="color:#FF2200;">Te</span><span style="color:#FF4400;">xa</span><span style="color:#FF6600;">sD</span><span style="color:#FF8800;">ex</span>]] [[User talk:TexasDex|<span style="color:#FFAA00;">&#9733;</span>]] 21:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

<hr style="width:50%;"/>

:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (<small>''[[User talk:Ceyockey|talk to me]]''</small>) 18:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

* '''Delete''' If you're analyzing blogs, you'll call it blog analysis. That doesn't make it a term or a field of study. [[WP:N]] [[WP:RS]]. This may very well become a common term in the future, but it doesn't appear to be ready for WP yet. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] 21:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' It is a term I have been seeing recently. The article needs a lot of work but it is a valid subject. [[User:MortimerCat|MortimerCat]] 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as original research and neologism unless someone provides a substantial rewrite with sources.-'''[[User:HisSpaceResearch|h i s]]''' ^{''[[User talk:HisSpaceResearch|s p a c e]]''} _{'''[[Special:Contributions/HisSpaceResearch|r e s e a r c h]]'''} 11:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''' Per Verdatum. [[User:Twenty Years|Twenty]] [[User talk:Twenty Years|Years]] 15:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>