Module talk:Annotated link: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
I've just been watching my watchlist turn into a rainbow and am not touching anything until I'm sure it's stopped 👀 ~~~~
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
== Requested move 2 February 2023 ==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''
 
The result of the move request was: '''Moved'''. There appears to be a consensus on moving this to the proposed title, and as such applying common sense, it would not been good to keep this request open unnecessarily. However, moving the module requires technical help which has been sought at relevant venues, at RMT and the [[WP:RFHM]] respectively. ─ [[User:TheAafi|<span style="color:SteelBlue">The Aafī</span>]] [[User talk:TheAafi|<span style="color:#80A0FF">(talk)</span>]] 15:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC) <small>(Modified closing statement at 16:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC))</small>
----
 
 
 
* [[:Module:AnnotatedLink]] → {{no redirect|Module:Annotated link}}
Line 14 ⟶ 21:
'''Note for closer:''' since the move target already exists (now) and is a functional, protected module in high use, and I am the only significant editor of this module (other than when User:Favonian protected it) and the replacement, and the development history is not vital for understanding the function, it might be best to close as not moved, and I'll tag it for speedy deletion with {{tl|Db-g7}} (pretty sure) once I've orphaned it. Right now, because of this move discussion, this module shows up transcluded all over the place where it shouldn't be, which really isn't helping. <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">[[User:Fred Gandt|Fred Gandt]] · [[User talk:Fred Gandt|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Fred Gandt|contribs]]</code> 10:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
:: I requested a [[WP:RFHM|history merge]]. If that's declined (sometimes people there don't like history merging one-author pages), feel free to G7. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 15:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
{{abot}}
I believe everything important has now been cleaned up. If you want the page currently at [[Module:AnnotatedLink]] (a soft redirect) to be deleted, feel free to tag it for speedy deletion (but [[WP:CSD#Pages that need to be tagged in a special manner|modules have to be tagged using special syntax]]). I have no opinion on the matter, and am sorry that this turned into a much greater mess that I expected. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 20:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
::{{u|Pppery}}, if there's no problems with the move I'll remove the discussion on RMT. Sorry for making a mess ;p [[User:Silikonz|'''<span style="background:#36c;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">Silikonz</span>''']][[User talk:Silikonz|<span style="background:#eaecf0;padding:2px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">💬</span>]] 20:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
:I've just been watching my watchlist turn into a rainbow and am not touching anything until I'm sure it's stopped 👀 Even posted this caused an edit conflict! 🤣 <code style="background:#DFF;white-space:pre">[[User:Fred Gandt|Fred Gandt]] · [[User talk:Fred Gandt|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Fred Gandt|contribs]]</code> 20:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)