Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability-based programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:50, 10 August 2014

Latest revision as of 22:08, 5 February 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 12:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

===[[Capability-based programming]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|U}}

:{{la|Capability-based programming}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability-based programming|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 3#{{anchorencode:Capability-based programming}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Capability-based_programming Stats]</span>)

Line 8 ⟶ 14:

Moving to '''Merge''' into SMPTE ST2071 article, which is becoming an accepted standard. [[User:scope_creep|scope_creep]] [[User talk:scope_creep|talk]] 12:34 8 August 2014 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">Jinkinson</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue;">talk to me</fontspan>]] 19:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)</small>

* '''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTSOAPBOX]]. [[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 19:38, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''&mdash;I'm not seeing enough in the way of [[WP:RS]] to justify an article at this point in time. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 14:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

*The article discusses a methodology described within the SMPTE ST2071-1 standards document to address the "Basket of Remotes" and object self-description problems posed by generic device/service control applications. I have added the reference to the prose document in which it is defined and removed any text that sounds promotional. [[User:posicks|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">posicks</fontspan>]] [[User talk:posicks|<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue;">talk to me</fontspan>]] <small>17:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)</small>

*The methodology of using identified features (aka. Capabilities in this case) is becoming a common theme in device/service control applications, such as media & device control within the professional media industry, home automation, and the Internet of Things. For example, the Eclipse Smart Home Core project has/is adding similar concepts, calling the objects "Things" and the identified features "Channels", as has the FIMS 1.1 standard with the introduction of "Capabilities" to their Repository specification. In addition, products by vendors such as Fairlight also use these concepts within their product lines in order to allow clients to work with features, not objects. The methodology of implementing self-describing objects through the use of small, concise, uniquely identified features seems to be an emerging development pattern. Maybe this text is better served as part of the SMPTE ST2071 article until the methodology becomes more commonplace. Please advise. [[User:posicks|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">posicks</fontspan>]] [[User talk:posicks|<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue;">talk to me</fontspan>]] <small>19:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)</small>

:Hi [[User:posicks|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">posicks</fontspan>]]. This is a really filthy business, moving to delete the written word. I really don't want this article deleted (being an inclusionist and being a software dev with 25+ years in industry), but at the moment, there is a drive in WP in which articles need to be both verifiable and notable. Is there any development environment around the standard, any reference designs, any stuff say by a dev community of perhaps Microsoft Codeplex, GitHub, Google Groups or any dev site. Is there any reference samples, resource kits, other blog posts, comments in trade papers, whitepapers anything which can add some depth to the references. Had a look at the FIMS 1.1. It does seem to be an emerging standard, with a Youtube series on. It also seems to be fairly robust. I think a merge into SMPTE ST2071 article is the best approach until it becomes best practice.

:[[User:scope_creep|scope_creep]] [[User talk:scope_creep|talk]] 12:34 8 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Is it 'In world' or 'out world' - i forget. There is a particular WP term to describe jargon that is only of interest to people who are specialist in a given field. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 14:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' it is currently an unsupported (lacks adequate coverage) [[WP:Neologism]]/concept, maybe it is just [[WP:TOOSOON]] as [[User:scope creep|scope creep]] suggests, or maybe it is destined for the dustbin of history. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 15:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>