Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:17, 27 February 2007

Latest revision as of 04:20, 6 February 2023

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="color:blue;">Majorly</span>]]''' _{[[User talk:Majorly|<span style="color:green;">(o rly?)</span>]]} 23:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

===[[Comparison of layout engines (CSS)]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Comparison of layout engines (CSS)}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 24#{{anchorencode:Comparison of layout engines (CSS)}}|View log]])</noinclude>

This is not appropriate content for wikipedia. It is [[WP:OR]], and lacks [[WP:RS]]. Bug lists of this nature have no place here. It is impossible to provide reliable sources for the claims.

Line 27 ⟶ 34:

*'''Keep''' per [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]]. --[[User:Voidxor|Voidxor]] 04:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Not worthy or notable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not for minute technical details of minute aspects of the huge realm of internet design, it is an encylopedia... This belongs in a technical manual, no doubt, but that is not what wikipedia is.--[[User:Vox Rationis|Vox Rationis]] 00:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. [[WP:NOT#IINFO]] of the how-to guide variety. Absolutely fails to be an [[WP:ENC]]yclopedia article. The [[WP:ATT]]ributability, or not, of the content is irrelevant. The best referencing in the world wouldn't make this suitable for Wikipedia. There ought to be some WMF/Wikia project this can be transwikied to, where it would be right at home, but this isn't it. [[User:Angusmclellan|Angus McLellan]] [[User talk:Angusmclellan|(Talk)]] 19:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' as objective and encyclopedic tabulation of verifiable information. You can call it a bug list to make it sound bad, but it is still a compatibility list. This is not a how-to guide. If sources are contradictory, more reason to verify them, and verifying the correctness of sources is not OR. If the tables are neglecting any CSS properties, then mention them on the Talk page. –[[User talk:Pomte|Pomte]] 01:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>