Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-constrained modelling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Data-constrained modelling]]===▼
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. For the record, that a ''term'' is widely used does not mean that it is notable enough for an article - we need discussion on the ''term'' specifically to establish that per [[WP:GNG]]. Also, we have [[Wiktionary]] for term definitions. Also, most people arguing against deletion appear to be single-purpose accounts. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 16:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
▲===[[:Data-constrained modelling]]===
:{{la|Data-constrained modelling}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-constrained modelling|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 15#{{anchorencode:Data-constrained modelling}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Data-constrained_modelling Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Data-constrained modelling}})
{{Not a ballot}}
I'm astonished we still have this article. It was written by the person it claims originated the term, the early revisions are deleted as copyright violations of his published work, and virtually all the sources are his papers. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 23:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. Merry Christmas! '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. Merry Christmas! '''<sup>[[User:Babymissfortune|<
The term "data-constrained modelling" has a high hit rate in Google keyword search, and has been published by a range of rigorously peer-reviewed journals and other publications. These are indications of the community acceptance. It would serve as a helpful reference if the term is included in Wikipedia <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yangys au|Yangys au]] ([[User talk:Yangys au#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yangys au|contribs]]) 08:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{article creator|Yangys au}} <small>— [[User:Yangys au|Yangys au]] ([[User talk:Yangys au|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yangys au|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
*'''Delete''' As written, it's vanispamcruftisement for a topic that is far, far more narrow than the title would suggest (''most'' scientific models are constrained by data in ''some'' way!). The most highly-cited paper on the topic that I can find ([https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/4/047001]) has only 43 GS citations, which is well below any reasonable standard of notability (recalling that GS casts a pretty wide net for what counts as "published"). [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 19:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
The term 'data-constrained modelling' appears widely in the literature (Measurement Science & Engineering, Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, Modelling & Simulation in Material Science & Engineering, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, Advanced Materials, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, Physical Review E, Fuel, Materials & Corrosion, Materials Characterization, ...). A Web of Science search indicates the term 'data-constrained modelling' refers exclusively to the approach described in the article.The software that embodies the technique is available for download from the CSIRO Data Access Portal (CSIRO is Australia's main government research organisation). It has been downloaded and used by researchers in Australia, China, Europe and the USA, including RMIT University, Monash University, Melbourne University, Deakin University, several institutes of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Stanford University, Manchester University, Shanxi University, Tinjing University, China University of Petroleum and North University of China. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Murphy Tony Dr|Murphy Tony Dr]] ([[User talk:Murphy Tony Dr#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Murphy Tony Dr|contribs]]) 22:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <small>— [[User:Murphy Tony Dr|Murphy Tony Dr]] ([[User talk:Murphy Tony Dr|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Murphy Tony Dr|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
**Actually, I've seen the term used verbatim in [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01742.x ecology], in a sense that has nothing I can see to do with 3D microstructures. Also [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chris_Borstad/publication/233695344_Sensitivity_analyses_in_snow_avalanche_dynamics_modeling_and_implications_when_modeling_extreme_events/links/55a3b32a08aed99da24cab35.pdf avalanche dynamics] and [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/324203 paleoclimatology]. (It's a very generic-sounding term.) Availability of the software for downloading does not count towards [[WP:N|notability]], nor does the fact that [[WP:INDY|the authors have themselves published repeatedly]]. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 04:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I can hardly see a compelling reason why it should be deleted. For people like me, it is a useful source of reference. For those people who don't need it, it is harmless. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/218.26.34.65|218.26.34.65]] ([[User talk:218.26.34.65#top|talk]]) 01:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> <small>— [[Special:Contributions/218.26.34.65|218.26.34.65]] ([[User talk:218.26.34.65|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
:: See [[WP:USEFUL]] and [[WP:HARMLESS]]. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 10:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Misleading attempt to appropriate a widely-applied term for one person's output. If the described approach (setting modeling bounds based on available data) is sufficiently rare in microstructure research for the author(s) to specifically dub it with an acronym, good for them, but it doesn't merit an article. --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 14:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Piggybacking on what others have said, this pretty much falls into [[WP:NEOLOGISM]] territory for the way the author is trying to stretch the term. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 04:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
If the term is widely used, a constructive action is to add the missing information. A widely used term should not be deleted. [[Special:Contributions/61.157.136.229|61.157.136.229]] ([[User talk:61.157.136.229|talk]]) 13:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC) <small>— [[Special:Contributions/61.157.136.229|61.157.136.229]] ([[User talk:61.157.136.229|talk]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||