Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Feedback Protocol: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Closing debate; result was delete
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''delete'''. The burden of proof of notability/verifiability is on those who support keeping. No sources were provided, even after a relisting and the article is almost speedy deletable as [[WP:CSD#A1]] (almost no context). <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Broadway;">[[User:Mr.Z-man|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#056366;">Mr.</fontspan>]]''[[User talk:Mr.Z-man|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#056625;">'''Z-'''</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#054F66;">man</fontspan>]]''</fontspan>'' 05:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 
===[[Dynamic Feedback Protocol]]===
Line 11:
:{{la|Dynamic Feedback Protocol}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Feedback Protocol|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 28#{{anchorencode:Dynamic Feedback Protocol}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Does not assert notability. Article really doesn't have any substance. No sources, etc. [[User:Torc2|Torc2]] ([[User talk:Torc2|talk]]) 23:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
* '''Keep and expand''' important concept. <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Times;">[[User:DJ Creamity|<span style="color:#003">DJ Creamity</span>]]</fontspan><small><sup>''[[User Talk:DJ_Creamity|Oh Yeah!]]''</sup></small> 17:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
:* Important enough that it's been sitting in this state, without any references or sources and with absolutely nothing linked to it for two and a half years? [[User:Torc2|Torc2]] ([[User talk:Torc2|talk]]) 21:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
::* You are con {{<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] ([[User talk:Cburnett|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cburnett|contribs]]) 21:44, November 30, 2007 (UTC)}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
::: I am con? Are you stalking me by going through the AfDs I have and voting keep? [[User:Torc2|Torc2]] 22:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
* '''Keep''', no valid deletion criteria presented. Need of cleanup and expansion are not valid reasons. [[User:Cburnett|Cburnett]] 21:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Line 23:
 
 
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>