Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EC (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13:
No evidence of notability. Creator(s) apparently sock-puppets based on November 18 edit history (not confirmed). Apparent advertising or vanity article. [[User:Foggy Morning|Foggy Morning]] ([[User talk:Foggy Morning|talk]]) 03:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom; no sign of notability, no reliable sources. --[[User:Orangemike|<
*'''Delete''' per nom. No evidence of notability from independent reliable sources. Several mins of googling failed to find any. [[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp|talk]]) 11:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Line 21:
* '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Carter|Carter]] | [[User talk:Carter|Talk to me]] 16:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Need More info''' I think the page may have merit, but it needs to be examined in more detail. Computer language is usually not undstood by people and thus when something lacks understanding it is easier to delete it. I am not against deleting it, but rather we should not act first then question later.[[User:Thright|Thright]] ([[User talk:Thright|talk]]) 19:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)thright
*'''Delete''', no evidence of notability. [[User:JIP|<
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|