Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extensibility pattern: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 15:
* '''Redirect''' to [[extensibility]]. A [[WP:BEFORE|quick search]] does not turn up any sources that corroborate this article's treatment of several well-known software extensibility technologies (covered in other articles) as a single [[software design pattern]], so the article is a [[WP:NOTHOWTO|how-to guide]] masquerading as an encyclopedic article by the addition of a [[WP:OR|novel lede]]. [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 10:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - This discussion was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself. --[[User:Finngall|<
*'''Delete or redirect'''. Even on the Perl Design Patterns site it is listed under Application Features, not under any of the pattern types. In a search on Google and Google books, design patterns are described as having extensibility rather than there being an extensibility pattern. However the [[extensibility]] article doesn't mention design patterns, so a redirect might not be appropriate. [[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma|talk]]) 05:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma|talk]]) 05:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)</small>
|