Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:23, 1 February 2013

Latest revision as of 18:37, 6 February 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 5:

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. Consensus is that the article should be improved (which in fact the FDIC are welcome to do themselves) rather than deleted. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 20:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

===[[FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework]]===

Line 29:

:I admit there is one mayor problem here, that the articles title suggesting the article is giving a description of the current state of the FDIC EA. An alternative solution here is rename the article to something like [[FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (1997-2012)]], [[FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (2002-08)]], or [[FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (2008)]].

:-- [[User:Mdd|Mdd]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 00:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. &#9733;&#9734; [[User:DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">DUCK</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">IS</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">PEANUTBUTTER</fontspan>]]&#9734;&#9733; 18:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)</small>

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. &#9733;&#9734; [[User:DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">DUCK</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">IS</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">PEANUTBUTTER</fontspan>]]&#9734;&#9733; 18:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)</small>

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. &#9733;&#9734; [[User:DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">DUCK</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">IS</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:Green;">PEANUTBUTTER</fontspan>]]&#9734;&#9733; 18:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)</small>

<hr style="width:55%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />

Line 38:

*'''Keep'''. If the information is outdated, by their own admission it means it is a matter worth having information about. They can read [[WP:OUTDATED]] and propose ameliorations to the article. [[User:Alfy32|Alfy32]] ([[User talk:Alfy32|talk]]) 01:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

*'''Keep and rename''', see above. -- [[User:Mdd|Mdd]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 22:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>