Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fp code: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|Votes for Undeletion]] nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was DELETE. [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 22:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
===[[fp code]]===
plus: [[talk:fp code]], [[fail]], [[outcome]], [[now and fail]], [[now and fail statement]], [[NOW AND FAIL statement]], [[do statement]] and [[DO statement]]. (I think that is all.)
Line 4 ⟶ 10:
A formal logic system created by [[User:pyenos|pyenos]] in September 2005. Total nonsense / original research. I tagged this for speedy but the author removed the tag. -- [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 06:11, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
:'''Comment''': It is not important but does it have to be important? [[User:Pyenos|Pyenos]] 07:18, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Hey Pyenos. It is obvious that you have put a LOT of work into that article, however Wikipedia has a policiy on not listing original research (as it is an encyclopaedia, so it has to go with commonly accepted facts). However, if you are able to show real-world/practical applications of Fp code and its advantages/disadvantages to other programming languages, I would be happy to change my vote. It is, however, important that articles in Wikipedia are on notable things so that it does become a research source. I hope you don't get discouraged by all of this, as I'm sure you would be able to contribute to a lot of other articles out there.</b>cheers, [[User:Dr.alf|alf]] 11:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
Line 12 ⟶ 18:
*'''Strong Delete''' as nonsense and OR. (Comment to [[User:Mholland|mholland]]: ''all'' OR is OR "because the author has yet to publish it elsewhere", by definition.) And I have studied logic, but the article is incomprehensible to me. [[User:MCB|MCB]] 17:56, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as original research. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] 23:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
:'''Comment''': I purposely didn't use jargons and to me, although it is not important, it is consistent and complete. I could elaborate further, especially its application in computation but I thought this is for general audience. MCB, it is incomprehensible to you, probably because I didn't explain it using conventional logic, which was my intention. Why is it a nonsense if it works? It can work with a very simple program and it will automatically reduce to an outcome. Sorry if I made a mistake in writing this article. It seems you guys prefer me being a machine than being a human. I have a tendancy to think like a machine but I thought that was not appropriate. Do what you like with articles, but I could fill twenty or more full articles with the foundation of what I have wrote in Fp code, which I chose not to. My understanding was that this is for general audience and I had an interesting idea so I wanted to share it. I could do much more without being technical, such as to write a decoder program like in Geek Code. That may well happen if I do decide to develop this concept further. Please do understand that it was not my intention to post a garbage article. Bye. [[User:Pyenos|Pyenos]] 23:
* '''Delete'''. No original research, also, [[User:Pyenos]] is basically describing [[Automata Theory]] and [[Compiler theory]] [[User:Project2501a|Project2501a]] 00:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||