Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mar-Kov Computer Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''Delete'''. <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Chetblong|<span style="color:gray;">Chetblong</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Chetblong|<span style="color:#00dc64;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Chetblong|<span style="color:black;">C</span>]]</sup></span> 05:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
===[[Mar-Kov Computer Systems]]===
{{ns:0|O}}
:{{la|Mar-Kov Computer Systems}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mar-Kov Computer Systems]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mar-Kov Computer Systems|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 18#{{anchorencode:Mar-Kov Computer Systems}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 16 ⟶ 24:
:*'''Comment'''. I have [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion]] of [[Mar-Kov CMS]], which is a related article. Suggest that whatever the outcome of this discussion, the two articles should meet a shared fate. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Canada|list of Canada-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 01:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computers|list of Computers-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)</small>
::*'''Question/comment'''. (meant non-contfrontationally) I'm curious as to what you mean by the comment that tech companies need strong indicia. Are you saying the standard should be different for tech than other companies? I only partly agree with your comment about "solutions." Yes, using an otherwise wonderful word in that way as marketing speak is a pox on the language. But if one swallows that, I don't think it's POV. It's just a synonym for "software that addresses a business or process function." It's only by insisting that "solutions" retain its primary meaning, that a problem is successfully and fully resolved, that it becomes POV.[[User:Wikidemo|Wikidemo]] ([[User talk:Wikidemo|talk]]) 15:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - couldn't see any notability here. The fairness argument that a company should be included if its competitors are has appeal but I don't agree. We're here to foster knowledge in the world, not to create a marketplace. There's a close cousin to that argument that does work...if we cover 90% of a subject we ought to cover the other 10% because otherwise the gap is unencyclopedic. It really depends on the nature and shape of a business. If there is a small number of companies in a field, and if the field is such that really understanding the field requires us to know each of the competitors, it makes sense to describe them all one way or another. If there are an indefinite number, or if a complete list isn't really essential, no reason to do it just out of fairness.[[User:Wikidemo|Wikidemo]] ([[User talk:Wikidemo|talk]]) 15:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per Wikidemo. [[User:GreenJoe|GreenJoe]] 12:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||