Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadow (programming): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Wickethewok (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''Keep (No consensus)'''.I think 2 relists is enough to establish we do not have consensus one way or the other. --'''[[User:Lar/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">+</span>]][[Special:Emailuser/Lar|+]]'''[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 04:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
===[[Meadow (programming)]]===
contested prod. Reasons provided ere "non notable software, vandalized for a month" -- <small> [[User talk:Drini|Drini]]</small> 04:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Non-notable. "with ADvantages Over Windows" hardly makes it unique. [[User:Dlyons493|<
'''Comment''' As Vegaswikian says, at best a Merge into the language article. I've no objection to that being done. [[User:Dlyons493|<
*'''Weak keep''' A Google search for "Meadow" and "emacs" seems to indicate that it is quite popular among Japenese Windows users. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|<
----
''Relisted for further consensus'' [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 11:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''weak keep''' per Ohnoitsjamie or '''merge''' into [[Emacs]] <b>[[User:Jwestbrook|<
*'''keep''' Disk space is cheap, human effort isn't. No real reason to delete it, and well, almost all open source projects start small. [[User:Bryce|Bryce]] 22:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to the main Emacs article and add a one-line mention about this port in there. The article is really devoid of real information anyway. -- [[User:Hirudo|Hirudo]] 14:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Line 13 ⟶ 20:
** <nitpick> It's a port of an editor, not a language </nitpick> -- [[User:Hirudo|Hirudo]] 19:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
<div style="text-align: center">''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!''<br/>[[User:Prodego|<
*'''Keep'''. It's not just a port. What Meadows achieves is to extend the capabilities of emacs to make it suitable for use in complicated linguistic environments, such as the [[Japanese writing system]], in which a literate user needs to be able to freely combine [[Kanji]] with two [[syllabary|syllabaries]]: [[Hiragana]] and [[Katakana]]. --[[User:Lambiam|Lambiam]][[User talk:Lambiam|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 16:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Whether or not its useful doesn't matter in my opinion as far as WP-ness. However, there is no verifiable info/sources or any claims of the usage of such an application (eg. do a lot of people use it?). Not every piece of potentially useful software gets its own article. [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] 20:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|