Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modelresource.ca: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dark Shikari (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] 14:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
===[[Modelresource.ca]]===
Appears to be an ad. ~600 hits on google, many of which are the site itself. [[User:Dark Shikari|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><
I won't oppose the deletion if it does in fact contravene the policies of self-promotion. Recently - because of the success of [[Canada's Next Top Model]] - I've been requested to speak at a lot of events. As the event organizers take proposals to potential third-party sponsors a lot are asking what Modelresource.ca is.
I tried to be fair in what I wrote (not listing numbers of visitors, for example), but as I re-read it I can see how it might come across as vanity or blatant advertising. If you can suggest revisions I'm open to that, otherwise, as I said, I won't oppose deletion if you feel there is no place for it on Wikipedia. [[User:Dangle14|Dangle14]] 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
:The main issue is that you have no sources other than the website itself. A Wikipedia article on the topic needs ''secondary'' sources like newspaper articles. [[User:Dark Shikari|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><
Fair enough. I won't argue that. [[User:Dangle14|Dangle14]] 14:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Does not appear to meet the criteria in the [[WP:WEB]] guideline. The article also contains [[WP:V|unverified]] statements (i.e. who visits the site). [[User:Agent 86|Agent 86]] 17:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|