Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori-Based Dementia Programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11:
Therapy program developed by nn doctor and research institute (who, based on their website, appear to exist to sell training and products related to this program). Not affliated with any [[Montessori]] organisation. One self-sourced external link, two non-working external links. Article started as obvious cut-and-paste copyvio and is maintained and promulgated by a series of [[WP:SPA|single purpose accounts]]. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 17:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science|list of Social science-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
Line 23:
*'''Keep''' per [http://scholar.google.be/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Montessori-Based+Dementia+Programming%22&btnG=Search this] and [http://scholar.google.be/scholar?q=Montessori+dementia&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search this] on Google Scholar. There are over 300 articles in the scientific literature, although this exact title seems to be a trademarked version of the method (which also has scientific publications). --[[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] <small>([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Reply]])</small> 10:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
**Note that most, if not all, of the papers that turn up in the first search were authored by doctors from the aforementioned institute. [[User:Delicious carbuncle|Delicious carbuncle]] ([[User talk:Delicious carbuncle|talk]]) 12:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. It does appear notable enough. It is a well published method by the original finders/authors and the term is used in articles by other authors. [[User:Ciar|<
*'''Keep''', as {{PMID|10750318}} on the subject has been cited 29 times, which is quite a high impact. [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&cites=16975777651370492516 citing articles] [[User:TimVickers|Tim Vickers]] ([[User talk:TimVickers|talk]]) 18:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||