Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented SQL: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was redirect to Object-oriented_programming#Object-orientation_and_databases |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10:
:{{la|Object-oriented SQL}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented SQL|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 23#{{anchorencode:Object-oriented SQL}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Object-oriented_SQL Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Object-oriented SQL}})
No sources since 2009. The article consists of two sentences and I am actually not sure what they are about. I suggest it be [[WP:TNT]]'d. <
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)</small>
*Could the nominator actually explain what is wrong with the many sources in GBooks which refer to ""Object-oriented SQL" and "OSQL"? Could the nominator also explain why this can't be redirected to [[SQL]]? [[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 15:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
** The fact that this article uses none of them. There is no useful content in this article, it borders on {{tlx|db-nocontext}}. Having it as a [[WP:REDLINK]] for a while would encourage creation of a better-written article.
*: Also, where is it established that "Object-oriented SQL" is the same as "OSQL"? Databases do not seem to be your area of expertise. <
***[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fFh2G9AeEgcC&pg=PA183 This source] does appear to say that OSQL is an abbreviation for Object-oriented SQL. It refers to "a prototype object oriented SQL language (OSQL)". [[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 18:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Object-oriented_programming#Object-orientation_and_databases]]. There isn't a single entity called "Object Oriented SQL", nor is it a particular technique that has been discussed in the peer-reviewed literature. Rather, this is simply a descriptive term that has been used across multiple software projects. For example, [[SQL:1999]] is [http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~cgutierr/cursos/BD/standards.pdf "characterized as 'object-oriented SQL'"], ESQL2 is [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=213178&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D213178 "an object-oriented SQL with F-Logic semantics"], UniSQL's SQIJX is an [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=181552 "object-oriented SQL"], etc. Particular implementations may be notable (''e.g.'', [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22IRIS+OSQL%22+&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 IRIS OSQL]), but as best I can tell, the topic at hand is not. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 18:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Line 26:
*'''Redirect''' to [[Object-oriented_programming#Object-orientation_and_databases]]. I was unable to find anything like a survey of OOSQL variants. There are prominent examples like [[SQL/OLB]] in [[SQL:2011]], [[Structured type]]s, and to a lesser extent, [[LINQ]]. But listing these without an underlying secondary source/survey backing up our opinions would be [[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]] on our part. The term is used in the literature and is verifiable, however, so a redirect is warranted. [[Object-oriented_programming#Object-orientation_and_databases]] is a reasonable target. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 19:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||