Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open source computer graphics: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Thebainer|bainer]] ([[User_talk:Thebainer|talk]]) 10:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
===[[Open source computer graphics]]===
'''Delete''' This is a bunch of mostly-unrelated summaries of several different other articles, and seems to have no redeeming content of its own at all. I don't think there's anything which could be done to make it useful, and even if there is, I think it could be done only by starting again. --[[User:Fuzzie|Fuzzie]] <small>([[User talk:Fuzzie|talk]])</small> 00:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', no unique content. A rewrite is not out of the question, though. [[User:Royboycrashfan|<
*'''Weak keep''' - arguably a reasonable topic, and the article does not look beyond redemption. [[User:Metamagician3000|Metamagician3000]] 01:45, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' full of ''main article'' links. '''[[User:Fetofs|<
*'''Delete''', nothing special about this article, more or less a summary, a rewrite is useless. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<
* '''Merge''' with either [[Open Source]] or [[Computer Graphics]]. [[User:Swatjester|<
*'''Delete''' per Fetofs. -[[User:AED|AED]] 07:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete''', agree with nominator.-[[User:Mr Adequate|Mr Adequate]] 09:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --<
*'''Weak keep''' per Metamagician3000 -[[User:ALoopingIcon|ALoopingIcon]] 16:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''delete''', per nom. [[User:Cchan199206|Chris Chan]].[[User talk:Cchan199206|talk]].[[Special:Contributions/Cchan199206|contribs]] 18:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' removed the summaries but there isnt much left -- [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]]<small>|[[User talk:Astrokey44|talk]]</small> 09:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' Even as an open source supported I'm willing to say this would either be cruft or POV. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 14:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per non --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 23:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
|