Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns in multiple-choice tests: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:10, 13 February 2022

Latest revision as of 15:32, 8 February 2023

Line 14:

*'''Delete''' per nom.[[User:Alberon|Alberon]] 10:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' - in this case, there would be no reason other than notability for anyone to make the unsourced article. It needs cleaning up, and sourcing, though. [[User:Digital Emotion|<font colorspan style= "color:#FDD017;">digitalemotion</fontspan>]] 11:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per the two comments above the one above. I don't get the explanation about why this should be kept. It's notable because someone wrote an article? [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] 12:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Unsourced, appears to violate [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Cogswobble|Cogswobble]][[User_talk:Cogswobble|<small>talk</small>]] 14:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Line 21:

*'''Delete'''. This sort of thing would work great in some of the articles devoted to statistics or human psychological biases, but alone...? No. --[[User:136.223.3.130|136.223.3.130]] 15:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Pure OR and likely to be pure speculation as well. --[[User:Blanchardb|Blanchardb]] 18:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Could not find any [[WP:RS]], fail [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:N]]. i agree that some of this info (if sources found) should be merged with other statistical articles. <span style="background:#000000">[[User:Matthew Yeager|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#00FF00;">Matthew</fontspan></b>]][[User Talk:Matthew Yeager|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#00FF00;">Yeager</fontspan></b>]]</span> 22:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'', fails [[WP:OR]] [[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]] 14:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)