Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns in multiple-choice tests: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Patterns in multiple-choice tests: --Added comment-- |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''Delete'''. --[[User:Tikiwont|Tikiwont]] 11:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
===[[Patterns in multiple-choice tests]]===
:{{la|Patterns in multiple-choice tests}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns in multiple-choice tests|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 7#{{anchorencode:Patterns in multiple-choice tests}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 8 ⟶ 14:
*'''Delete''' per nom.[[User:Alberon|Alberon]] 10:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - in this case, there would be no reason other than notability for anyone to make the unsourced article. It needs cleaning up, and sourcing, though. [[User:Digital Emotion|<
*'''Delete''' per the two comments above the one above. I don't get the explanation about why this should be kept. It's notable because someone wrote an article? [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] 12:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Unsourced, appears to violate [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Cogswobble|Cogswobble]][[User_talk:Cogswobble|<small>talk</small>]] 14:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Totally goes against [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. Other than helping students cheat (will it really work?), there is no other use for this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a cheating forum. --[[User:Zachary crimsonwolf|<
*'''Delete'''. This sort of thing would work great in some of the articles devoted to statistics or human psychological biases, but alone...? No. --[[User:136.223.3.130|136.223.3.130]] 15:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Pure OR and likely to be pure speculation as well. --[[User:Blanchardb|Blanchardb]] 18:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Could not find any [[WP:RS]], fail [[WP:OR]] and [[WP:N]]. i agree that some of this info (if sources found) should be merged with other statistical articles. <span style="background:#000000">[[User:Matthew Yeager|<b><span style="color:#00FF00;">Matthew</span></b>]][[User Talk:Matthew Yeager|<b><span style="color:#00FF00;">Yeager</span></b>]]</span> 22:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'', fails [[WP:OR]] [[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]] 14:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||