Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plaid (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:12, 9 April 2015

Latest revision as of 17:41, 8 February 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 5:

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. Willing to userfy upon request. [[User:Nakon|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C50;">'''Nakon'''</fontspan>]] 07:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

===[[Plaid (programming language)]]===

Line 11:

:({{Find sources AFD|Plaid (programming language)}})

Unnotable programming language. Fails [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:NSOFT]], [[WP:TOOSOON]]. &#8213;<span style="background:#8FF;border:solid 1px;border-radius:8px;box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px">&nbsp;[[User:Padenton|<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:#C00">Padenton</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Padenton|&#9993;]]&nbsp;</span>&nbsp; 15:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]^{[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<fontspan sizestyle="font-2size:x-small;">1000</fontspan>]]}</span> 16:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete''' – While the attention given at the 2009 "Onward" conference is the beginnings of notability, the fact that there has been little else said or published since then, except in passing, indicates that this has not yet achieved notability, and creation of this article was premature. The passing mention of Plaid at [[typestate analysis]] is sufficient coverage for Wikipedia. [[User:Ibadibam|Ibadibam]] ([[User talk:Ibadibam|talk]]) 19:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' This "Typestate-Oriented Programming" rings a bell. While the language itself may not be notable enough for a separate article it could be merged as part of an article on [[Typestate-oriented programming]] or [[typestate analysis]]. I'd have to look further into this. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 11:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

*'''Keep, or worst case merge''': There are easy to find references to the language at Carnegie-Mellon, MIT, and Berkeley. There has been 2011 published material since the 2009 article mentioned. I think this is obviously both a legitimate topic and one worth expanding. Deletion achieves nothing. Worst case, merge. [[User:Pratyeka|prat]] ([[User talk:Pratyeka|talk]]) 09:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', two self-published sources, one blog, one unclear conference. {{ping|Pratyeka}} it's not only allowed to improve deletion candidates, but just saying that it could be done doesn't help. &ndash;[[User:Be..anyone|Be..anyone]] ([[User talk:Be..anyone|talk]]) 18:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>