Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:31, 16 February 2022

Latest revision as of 19:31, 8 February 2023

Line 11:

<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory}}</ul></div>

:{{la|Programmer's Truth Theory}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer&#39;s Truth Theory|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 July 13#{{anchorencode:Programmer's Truth Theory}}|View log]])</noinclude>

CSD template repeatedly removed by page creator and IP address; creator admits article is original research and unsourceable <span style="background:Black;border:1px solid Orange;padding:1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Doonhamer|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;">DOONHAMER </fontspan></b>]]<fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;">|</fontspan>[[User_talk:Doonhamer|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;"> BANTER</fontspan></b>]]&nbsp;</span> 16:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

:The page creator removed an original db-nonsense template. I don't think the article was nonsense, but it was pretty clearly [[WP:NOR|original research]] and [[WP:V|not verifiable]]; the creator admitted as much on the talk page. I added the NOR and Unreferenced templates to provide more context, but they were later removed by an IP address. I would have just listed this in the request for comments page, but with the history of removed CSD tags and the very small possibility of ever being able to verify the article's content, I thought I'd bring it here for discussion. <span style="background:Black;border:1px solid Orange;padding:1px;">&nbsp;[[User:Doonhamer|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;">DOONHAMER </fontspan></b>]]<fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;">|</fontspan>[[User_talk:Doonhamer|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:Orange;"> BANTER</fontspan></b>]]&nbsp;</span> 16:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

*'''Strong delete'''. Original research, as admitted to by original editor. No independent sources, so it is not verifiable. In absence for a scholarly claim about the theory, it is not notable. (The article is cohesive enough that it's not patent nonsense, so I don't see a criterion under which it can be speedily deleted.) —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 16:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

*'''20-Mule-Team Delete:''' There's not a ''single'' Google hit for this soi-disant unsourced, OR-by-definition theory, not even from this article, which is truly impressive. Toss in [[WP:COI]], since the article's creator and editor is [[User talk:Brichard12]], and there you have it. [[User:RGTraynor|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> &nbsp;RGTraynor&nbsp;</span>''']] 17:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)