Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoadChef: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''KEEP''' —[[User:Whouk|Wh]][[User:Whouk/Esperanza|<
===[[RoadChef]]===
<s>Non-notable company, pulls up a few hundred hits on Google but none of them do more than mention the company in passing. [[User:Aplomado|<
*'''Delete''' Isn't having an article on a small company that owns a few rest stops going a little too far? [[User:Where|Where]] 00:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', "one of the largest Motorway Services Area (MSA) operators in the UK, with 21 sites representing 24% of the market and serving some 60 million visitors each year" according to [http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=2153193 Google Finance]. [[User:Extraordinary Machine|Extraordinary Machine]] 01:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
**OK, good point. I added that information to the article. I'll go ahead and withdraw my nomination now since I think that fact makes it keepable. [[User:Aplomado|<
*'''Speedy close''', since the nomination was withdrawn. --[[User:Coredesat|Coredesat]] 04:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
|