Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMITH programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:03, 26 September 2006

Latest revision as of 02:40, 9 February 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer&nbsp;]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo/D|D]]'''[[User:Mailer diablo|iablo]] 12:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

===[[SMITH (programming language)|SMITH programming language]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&diff=prev&oldid=75309566 here]. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 04:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', non-notable programming language. [[User:JIP|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#CC0000;">J</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#00CC00;">I</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#0000CC;">P</fontspan>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 07:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as the language itself is merely a one-off thought experiment, but I think this is perhaps worth a brief mention in [[Turing completeness]] to further illustrate the variety of possible Turing-complete languages. [[User:flowersofnight|flowersofnight]] [[User talk:flowersofnight|(talk)]] 17:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

** '''No!''' Please do not add useless trivia/cruft to genuinly encyclopedic articles. There are dozens of Turing-complete esoteric langauges in existence. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 21:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per my rationale at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages]]. —''[[User:R._Koot|Ruud]]'' 21:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>