Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science and technology: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 15:
:::'''Comment''' That's why I think the scope of the article should be changed to reflect this relationship, rather than delete the article altogether. Technological and scientific progress go hand in hand, and there are a lot of academic works, historical or sociological, explaning the historic relationship between the development of both.--[[User:Lobizón|Lobizón]] 12:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
::::'''Comment''' Which is why we properly have articles on the academic disciplines studying these two terms: [[science and technology studies]] & [[history of science and technology]]. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|ZimZalaBim]] ([[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]) 12:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', purely redundant. --[[User:Terence Ong|Ter]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<
*'''Delete''' These concepts should '''(and are)''' discussed in two seperate articles. This article is not needed. <b>[[User:BrendelSignature|<span style="font-family:Arial; color:#1F860E;">Signature</span>]][[User:BrendelSignature|<sup style="color:#20038A;">brendel</sup>]]</b><small>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/BrendelSignature|Now under review!]]</small> 07:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' for now. I think we need to be carefull here and it might be best to see how the article develops for a while. As is pointed out on the talk page the term "Science and Technology" is used frequently as in "S & T Studies", "History of S & T" etc. This make it a likely search term on WP. It is not just the sum of what is on two different articles. I would much prefer to have time to argue this out on the talk page rather than at AfD. --[[User:Bduke|Bduke]] 12:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
| |||