Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:40, 20 November 2014

Latest revision as of 05:41, 9 February 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 10:

:{{la|Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 12#{{anchorencode:Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Semantics-pragmatics-syntax_trinity Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources AFD|Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity}})

Article was AfDed incorrectly and without explanation by a new user. Taking a look, it's pretty clear that this is [[WP:OR]]. The second sentence of the lead is {{tq|"'Semantics-pragmatics-syntax trinity' is probably not an official term."}} Certainly fails [[WP:GNG]] and could probably be deleted per [[WP:NEO]], [[WP:NOT]], [[WP:MADEUP]], or a host of others. I see it was PRODded with no explanation a while back, and thus declined, so that may preclude CSD. Given that, and the aforementioned attempted AfD, this seemed like the more appropriate venue. &mdash; <ttspan style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></ttspan> \\ 16:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Jinkinson|<fontspan colorstyle="color:orange;">Jinkinson</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Jinkinson|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">talk to me</fontspan>]] 16:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete,''' one of those cases where if [[WP:MADEUP]] was a speedy tag, it would be long gone. The only mention I can find of this subject online is in some obscure textbook-looking-thing, and no hits on scholar. [[User:Deadbeef|<span style="color:#090;">Dea</span>]][[User Talk:Deadbeef|<span style="color:#000">db</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Deadbeef|<span style="color:#090">eef</span>]] 21:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

:*{{ping|Deadbeef}} there is a (poosible) speedy tag: [[WP:A11]]. [[User:Stickee|Stickee]] <small>[[User talk:Stickee|(talk)]]</small> 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Line 18:

*'''Delete''' No coverage of this term anywhere. Possible [[WP:A11]]. [[User:Stickee|Stickee]] <small>[[User talk:Stickee|(talk)]]</small> 00:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' [[WP:MADEUP]] ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 16:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>