Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:53, 15 February 2005

Latest revision as of 06:37, 9 February 2023

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 81:

Keep disney-stub, and bio-stub. Redirect city-stub to geo-stub, (avoids recreation). Disney stub is new, and Disney is big enough to warrant its own stub. Bio-stub should be kept for the same reason stub is still kept. You actually want to create a stub for every profession in the world? Don't you think that's a bit excessive? --[[User:AllyUnion| AllyUnion]] [[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]] 08:39, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

:'''Delete [[Template:disney-stub|disney-stub]]''' and recategorize articles ... unless the current 23 articles can be expanded <s>past 100</s>. I'd suggest a time-limit on that of 7 to 14 days. [[User:Ceyockey|Courtland]] 12:45, 2005 Feb 9 (UTC)

::I'm sure there are a ton of Disney movies that are listed under film-stub. This strikes me as precisely the sort of category that a dedicated fan might find useful. I'll see what I can find. -[[User:Aranel|Aranel]] ("<fontspan colorstyle="color:#ba0000;"><u>Sarah</u></fontspan>") 01:59, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

:::Update: Without any actual effort, I managed to increase the category to 75 articles. I would say that there are definitely enough for this to be a viable category. ([[:Category:Movie stubs]] is enormous and needs to be divided further rather than having other categories merged into it.) -[[User:Aranel|Aranel]] ("<fontspan colorstyle="color:#ba0000;"><u>Sarah</u></fontspan>") 23:00, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[[Category:WikiProject Stub sorting archives: Criteria]]