Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Femto Bot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:28, 1 April 2022

Latest revision as of 10:35, 9 February 2023

Line 48:

::::Thanks, fingers crossed. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 23:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

:::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Femto_Bot 38 edits here]. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 23:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

::::::<s>It's doing funky things [[:Category:Articles_with_a_promotional_tone_from_October_2010|here]]. What exactly is the MCUC 1211?</s> It's not the bot, it's the template that the bot is using. [[User:Netalarm|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#00AA11;">'''Netalarm'''</fontspan>]]^{[[User talk:Netalarm|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF9933;">'''talk'''</fontspan>]]} 05:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

::::::::Yes, that's a diagnostic I put in, should only show on [[:Category:BLP articles lacking sources from June 2006]] now, it illustrates a template problem - question posted at [[WP:VPT]]. Any template geniuses, or people good at spotting silly mistakes are invited to take a look. I'm currently baffled but just waiting for someone to tell me it's an obvious typo. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 08:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC).

:::::::::Yawn... worked around that issue, but it's stil a 0=1 type of thing. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 14:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC).<br />